VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00748 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00748 Petitioner: Melissa Schnell Filed: 2020-06-23 Decided: 2021-10-13 Vaccine: Tdap Vaccination date: 2019-07-03 Condition: Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 50060 AI-assisted case summary: Melissa Schnell filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on June 23, 2020, alleging she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) after receiving a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on July 3, 2019. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Ms. Schnell's claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA and that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the Vaccine Act. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement on August 27, 2021, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on September 10, 2021, the parties filed a proffer on the award of compensation. The public decision, issued on October 13, 2021, reflects this proffer. Ms. Schnell was awarded a total of $50,060.00, consisting of $50,000.00 for pain and suffering and $60.00 for past unreimbursable expenses. This award represents compensation for all damages available under Section 15(a) of the Vaccine Act. Petitioner was represented by Leah VaSahnja Durant of the Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, and Respondent was represented by Wei Kit Tai of the U.S. Department of Justice. The decision was made by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. Theory of causation field: Melissa Schnell filed a petition alleging a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) after receiving a Tdap vaccine on July 3, 2019. The respondent conceded that the claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA and that entitlement to compensation was appropriate. The Special Master found Petitioner entitled to compensation. The parties submitted a proffer on award of compensation, agreeing to a total award of $50,060.00, comprising $50,000.00 for pain and suffering and $60.00 for past unreimbursable expenses. This award was approved by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran on October 13, 2021. Petitioner was represented by Leah VaSahnja Durant and Respondent by Wei Kit Tai. The specific mechanism of injury and expert testimony are not detailed in the provided public text, but the claim falls under the "Table Injury" category for SIRVA. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00748-0 Date issued/filed: 2021-09-29 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 08/27/2021) regarding 22 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 29 Filed 09/29/21 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0748V UNPUBLISHED MELISSA SCHNELL, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 27, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Respondent. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Wei Kit Tai, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On June 23, 2020, Melissa Schnell filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis vaccine on July 3, 2019. Petition at 1, ¶ 7. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her SIRVA for more than six months and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her SIRVA. Id. at ¶¶ 7-8. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 29 Filed 09/29/21 Page 2 of 2 On August 27, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent has “concluded that [P]etitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA.” Id. at 3. Regarding the other statutory and jurisdictional requirements, Respondent further agrees that “entitlement to compensation is appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act.” Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00748-1 Date issued/filed: 2021-10-13 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/10/2021) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 30 Filed 10/13/21 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0748V UNPUBLISHED MELISSA SCHNELL, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: September 10, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Respondent. Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Wei Kit Tai, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 23, 2020, Melissa Schnell filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis vaccine on July 3, 2019. Petition at 1, ¶ 7. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On August 27, 2021, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On September 10, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $50,060.00, 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 30 Filed 10/13/21 Page 2 of 5 representing $50,000.00 for her pain and suffering and $60.00 for her past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $50,060.00, representing $50,000.00 for her pain and suffering and $60.00 for her actual unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 30 Filed 10/13/21 Page 3 of 5 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS MELISSA SCHNELL, Petitioner, v. No. 20-748V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On June 23, 2020, Melissa Schnell (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine she received on July 3, 2019. On August 27, 2021, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury. ECF No. 21. On August 27, 2021, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 22. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 30 Filed 10/13/21 Page 4 of 5 B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $60.00. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $50,060.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Melissa Schnell: $50,060.00 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:20-vv-00748-UNJ Document 30 Filed 10/13/21 Page 5 of 5 LARA A. ENGLUND Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ Wei Kit (Ricky) Tai WEI KIT (RICKY) TAI Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Direct dial: (202) 598-7705 Wei.Tai@usdoj.gov Dated: September 10, 2021 3