VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00333 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00333 Petitioner: Brian “Larry” Atkins Filed: 2020-06-30 Decided: 2025-02-18 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2018-10-15 Condition: mass on the left deltoid Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 10000 AI-assisted case summary: Brian “Larry” Atkins filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccine he received on October 15, 2018, caused a mass on his left deltoid. He contended that the vaccine was administered by an entity with inadequate safety controls, leading to similar injuries in others. This case was one of several related petitions, and the parties agreed to use a test case, Silvers v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, to determine entitlement. In that test case, the court found that the influenza vaccine caused a shoulder skin abscess associated with a bacterial infection. Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report in Mr. Atkins' case, electing not to defend and requesting a ruling on the record. Based on the evidence and the Silvers decision, the court found Mr. Atkins entitled to compensation. Subsequently, Respondent filed a proffer proposing an award of $10,000.00 for pain and suffering. The court reviewed the proffer and found it reasonable, adopting it as the decision awarding damages. The total award was $10,000.00, representing all elements of compensation to which Mr. Atkins is entitled. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00333-0 Date issued/filed: 2025-01-08 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/20/2024) regarding 35 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (af) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 37 Filed 01/08/25 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-333V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BRIAN “LARRY” ATKINS, * Chief Special Master Corcoran * Petitioner, * Filed: November 20, 2024 * * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tim Rutherford McCarthy, Nutt Law Office, Louisville, KY, for Petitioner. James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On June 30, 2020, Brian “Larry” Atkins (“Petitioner”) filed an amended petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (Vaccine Act). Petitioner alleges that an influenza vaccine he received on October 15, 2018, caused adverse effects, including a “mass on the left deltoid.” See generally Amended Petition. In particular, Petitioner contends that the vaccine he received was administered by a Kentucky mobile vaccination entity that was later determined to have exercised inadequate safety control over its vaccines, resulting in numerous vaccinated individuals experiencing comparable abscess injuries. 1 "Under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen (14) days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public in its present form. Id." Case 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 37 Filed 01/08/25 Page 2 of 2 This matter was initiated at the same time as a number of related petitions brought by similarly-situated claimants and represented by the afore-referenced attorney.2 The parties consented to resolution of entitlement in one “test case,” the results of which could then be applied to the related cases. On April 25, 2024, I ruled in favor of the Silvers petitioner, finding that the administration of the influenza vaccine had caused him to experience a right shoulder skin abscess associated with a bacterial infection. See Silvers v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 20-1V, 2024 WL 2799285 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 25, 2024). On October 23, 2024, Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report in this action. See Respondent’s Report (ECF No. 34) (“Report”). Having reviewed the evidence in this case and the Silvers decision, Respondent elected not to defend the case, and requested a ruling on the record. Report at 1-2. In view of Respondent’s position, and based on my own review of the record (see Section 13(a)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a)(I)), I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. The same reasoning set forth in Silvers for why compensation was appropriate therein also applies to this claim. On or before January 10, 2025, parties shall file a proffer or a joint status report detailing their status in resolving damages in this matter. Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Alexis Franks, at alexis_franks@cfc.uscourts.gov. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 See generally Silvers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20-1V), Stewart v. Health and Human Services (No. 20-19V), Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20-1048V), Stastny v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20-22V), and Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20-1120V). 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_20-vv-00333-1 Date issued/filed: 2025-02-18 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/13/2025) regarding 38 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (af) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/18/25 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-333-V * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BRIAN “LARRY” ATKINS, * Chief Special Master Corcoran * Petitioner, * Filed: January 13, 2025 * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Timothy Rutherford McCarthy, Nutt Law Office, Louisville, KY, for Petitioner. James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 30, 2020, Brian “Larry” Atkins (“Petitioner”) filed an amended petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (Vaccine Act). Petitioner alleges that an influenza vaccine he received on October 15, 2018, caused adverse effects, including a “mass on the left deltoid.” See generally Amended Petition. In particular, Petitioner contends that the vaccine he received was administered by a Kentucky mobile vaccination entity that was later determined to have exercised inadequate safety control over its vaccines, resulting in numerous vaccinated individuals experiencing comparable abscess injuries. This matter was initiated at the same time as a number of related petitions brought by similarly-situated claimants and represented by the same attorney.2 The parties consented to 1 Under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen (14) days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public in its present form. Id. 2 See generally Silvers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20-1V), Stewart v. Health and Human Services (No. 20-19V), Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20-1048V), Stastny v. Secretary of Case 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/18/25 Page 2 of 5 resolution of entitlement in one “test case,” the results of which could then be applied to the related cases. In April 2024, I ruled in favor of the test case petitioner, finding that the administration of the influenza vaccine had caused him to experience a right shoulder skin abscess associated with a bacterial infection. See generally Silvers v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 20-1V, 2024 WL 2799285 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 25, 2024). On October 23, 2024, Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report in this action. See Respondent’s Report (ECF No. 34) (“Report”). Having reviewed the evidence in this case and taking into account the Silvers decision, Respondent elected not to defend the case, requesting instead a ruling on the record. Report at 1-2. In view of Respondent’s position, and after my own review of the record, I found Petitioner was entitled to an award of damages. See Atkins v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 20-333V, 2024 WL 5297983 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 20, 2024). On January 7, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer proposing an award of compensation. Proffer (ECF No. 36) (“Proffer”). I have reviewed the filing and based upon that review, I conclude that Respondent’s proffer (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my Decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein. The proffer awards: • A lump sum payment of $10,000.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Proffer at 2. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which Petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id. I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master Health and Human Services (No. 20-22V), and Williams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (No. 20- 1120V). 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review. 2 Case 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/18/25 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ___________________________________ ) BRIAN “LARRY” ATKINS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 20-333V v. ) Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On June 30, 2020, Brian “Larry” Atkins (“petitioner”) filed an amended petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended (“the Vaccine Act” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, alleging an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on October 15, 2018, caused adverse effects, including a “mass on the left deltoid.” See Amended Petition (“Am. Pet.”) at 1; Petitioner’s Exhibit 10 at 1-2. On October 23, 2024, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report electing not to defend and requesting a ruling on the record regarding petitioner’s entitlement to compensation. ECF No. 34. On November 20, 2024, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation. ECF No. 35. C ase 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/18/25 Page 4 of 5 I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $10,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $10,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Brian “Larry” Atkins: $10,000.00 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C.SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:20-vv-00333-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/18/25 Page 5 of 5 VORIS E. JOHNSON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s James V. Lopez James V. Lopez Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3655 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: james.lopez@usdoj.gov Date: January 7, 2025 3