VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01884
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01884
Petitioner: JUANITA CHAPLIN
Filed: 
Decided: 2022-02-18
Vaccine: 
Vaccination date: 
Condition: 
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Juanita Chaplin filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation. The case progressed procedurally, and on December 28, 2021, both Petitioner Juanita Chaplin and Respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a joint stipulation to dismiss the case. The Court of Federal Claims, Office of Special Masters, issued an order on February 18, 2022, dismissing the case without prejudice pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). No judgment was entered. The specific vaccine, alleged injury, or any medical details were not discussed in this procedural order.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01884-0
Date issued/filed: 2022-02-18
Pages: 1
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 12/30/2021) regarding 40 ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Special Master Katherine E. Oler. (sl) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01884-UNJ Document 41 Filed 02/18/22 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1884V
(not to be published)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
JUANITA CHAPLIN, * Special Master Katherine E. Oler
*
Petitioner, *
*
Filed: December 30, 2021
*
v.
*
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Order Concluding Proceedings;
HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine Rule 21(a).
*
*
Respondent *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Patrick Hughes, Patriots Law Group of Lyons & Hughes, P.C., Suitland, MD, for Petitioner
Nancy Tinch, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On December 28, 2021, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B), the parties filed a joint
stipulation stating that the above-captioned case should be dismissed. ECF No. 39.
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby
dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall
not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
Any questions regarding this Order may be directed to my law clerk, Sydney Lee, by
telephone at 202-357-6347, or by email at Sydney_Lee@cfc.uscourts.gov.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Katherine E. Oler
Katherine E. Oler
Special Master
1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted
on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. §
3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As
provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the decision’s inclusion of
certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen
days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret
or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files
or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.”
Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Id.