Kevin T. Gaines v. HHS - Influenza, left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2022)

Filed 2019-12-09Decided 2022-03-18Vaccine Influenza
compensated$70,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Kevin T. Gaines filed a petition on December 9, 2019, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

He alleged that on December 19, 2016, he received an influenza vaccine and subsequently suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). Mr.

Gaines stated that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that he experienced residual effects for more than six months, and that he had not received a prior award or settlement for this condition. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Mr.

Gaines sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the flu vaccine caused his alleged shoulder injury or any other injury, and denied that his current condition was a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. Despite these denials, the parties filed a joint stipulation on February 15, 2022, agreeing to settle the case.

Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding Kevin T.

Gaines $70,000.00 as compensation for all damages available under the Vaccine Act. This award represents a compromise of the parties' respective positions on liability and damages.

The decision was issued on March 18, 2022. Petitioner was represented by Howard Dale Mishkind of Mishkind Law Firm Co., L.P.A., and respondent was represented by Matthew Murphy of the U.S.

Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Kevin T. Gaines alleged a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccine received on December 19, 2016. The respondent denied that the injury was a Table injury or that the vaccine caused the alleged shoulder injury. The parties reached a settlement via joint stipulation, agreeing to an award of $70,000.00. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or clinical findings. The award represents a compromise of the parties' positions. The decision was issued by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran on March 18, 2022. Petitioner's counsel was Howard Dale Mishkind, and respondent's counsel was Matthew Murphy.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded