Dennis Mantia v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2022)

Filed 2019-12-09Decided 2022-06-24Vaccine Influenza
compensated$47,500

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Dennis Mantia filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on December 9, 2019, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on September 21, 2018. Mr.

Mantia stated the vaccine was administered in the United States, he experienced residual effects for more than six months, and had not received prior compensation. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Mr.

Mantia sustained a SIRVA Table injury or that the flu vaccine caused his alleged shoulder injury. Despite these positions, the parties filed a joint stipulation on May 18, 2022, agreeing to settle the case.

Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation as the court's decision.

Mr. Mantia was awarded a lump sum of $47,500.00, payable by check, representing compensation for all damages available under the program.

The decision was entered on June 24, 2022. Petitioner was represented by Howard Scott Gold of Gold Law Firm, LLC, and respondent was represented by Martin Conway Galvin, a trial attorney with the U.S.

Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or the medical expert witnesses involved in this case.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Dennis Mantia received an influenza vaccine on September 21, 2018, and alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). Respondent denied a SIRVA Table injury or that the vaccine caused the alleged injury. The parties reached a joint stipulation for settlement. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding $47,500.00 as a lump sum. The stipulation does not admit that the vaccine caused the injury or that it was a Table injury. The public text does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the medical evidence considered beyond the stipulation. Petitioner was represented by Howard Scott Gold, and Respondent by Martin Conway Galvin. The decision date was June 24, 2022.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded