VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01833
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01833
Petitioner: KLAUDIA AUBUCHON
Filed: 2020-02-27
Decided: 2020-03-30
Vaccine: 
Vaccination date: 
Condition: 
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Klaudia Aubuchon filed a petition on February 27, 2020. The respondent is the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The petitioner filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss on February 24, 2020, stating that a petition had previously been filed on her behalf by other counsel. The Vaccine Act limits filers to one petition per vaccine administration. Therefore, the Chief Special Master granted the motion and dismissed the case without prejudice. No judgment was to be entered. No medical facts, vaccine details, or specific injuries were discussed in this procedural order.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01833-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-03-30
Pages: 1
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 02/27/2020) regarding 9 Order Concluding Proceedings Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01833-UNJ Document 10 Filed 03/30/20 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1833V
UNPUBLISHED
KLAUDIA AUBUCHON, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: February 27, 2020
v.
Vaccine Rule 21(a); No Judgment;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Order Concluding Proceedings;
HUMAN SERVICES, Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss
Respondent.
Alan K. Nicollette, Nordstrom, Steele, Tustin, CA , for petitioner.
Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On February 24, 2020, Petitioner filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss pursuant to
Vaccine Rule 21(a) in the above-captioned case. In support of this Motion, Petitioner
states that a petition was previously filed on behalf of Petitioner by another counsel.
The Vaccine Act states that “[o]nly one petition may be filed with respect to each
administration of a vaccine.” 42 U.S.C. §300aa-11(b)(2). Thus, Petitioner’s motion is
GRANTED.
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a), the above-captioned case is
hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that
a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
.