VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01732
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01732
Petitioner: Richard Porpora
Filed: 2019-11-07
Decided: 2020-07-07
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2017-09-25
Condition: Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Outcome: entitlement_granted_pending_damages
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Richard Porpora filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on November 7, 2019, alleging that he received an influenza vaccination on September 25, 2017, and subsequently developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a report on July 7, 2020, conceding that the petitioner's claim was appropriate for compensation. The respondent agreed that Mr. Porpora suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome following the influenza vaccine and that he met the statutory requirements for compensation, including suffering his condition for more than six months. Based on the respondent's concession and a review of the medical records, Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth found that Mr. Porpora is entitled to compensation. The case was then set to proceed to the damages phase. Petitioner was represented by Shealene Mancuso, Esq., of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Lara Englund, Esq., of the U.S. Department of Justice. The decision was issued on July 7, 2020, and is unpublished but available on the Court of Federal Claims' website.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Richard Porpora alleged that he received an influenza vaccination on September 25, 2017, and subsequently developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS). The respondent conceded that petitioner suffered GBS following the influenza vaccine and met the statutory requirements for compensation, including suffering the condition for more than six months. The Special Master, Mindy Michaels Roth, found entitlement based on the respondent's concession and a review of the record. The case proceeded to the damages phase. Petitioner was represented by Shealene Mancuso, Esq., and respondent by Lara Englund, Esq. The decision on entitlement was issued on July 7, 2020. The specific theory of causation relied upon was the "Table" provision of the Vaccine Act, as indicated by the respondent's concession regarding a condition listed in the Vaccine Injury Table.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01732-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-08-13
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 7/8/2020) regarding 15 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth. (mw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 17 Filed 08/13/20 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1732
Filed: July 8, 2020
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
RICHARD PORPORA, * UNPUBLISHED
*
Petitioner, *
*
v. * Ruling on Entitlement;
* Influenza; Guillain-Barre Syndrome
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Shealene Mancuso, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Lara Englund, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Roth, Special Master:
On November 7, 2019, Richard Porpora (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”)2 alleging that he
received the influenza vaccination on September 25, 2017, and thereafter suffered from Guillain-
Barre Syndrome. See Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1.
On July 7, 2020, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) stating that
1 Although this Ruling has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the
Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-
347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the
Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the
Ruling’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b),
each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that
party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or
(2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Ruling will be available to
the public. Id.
2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§
300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be
to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 17 Filed 08/13/20 Page 2 of 2
petitioner’s claim was appropriate for compensation. Resp. Rpt. at 1, ECF No. 14. Specifically,
respondent agrees with petitioner’s claim that he suffered the injury of Guillain-Barre Syndrome
following the influenza vaccine. Id. at 6, 9. Based on a review of the medical records, respondent
states that petitioner has met the applicable statutory requirements by suffering his condition for
more than six months and that, therefore, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for
compensation under the Act. Id. at 9.
A special master may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation based
upon the record. A hearing is not required. §300aa-13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). In light of
respondent’s concession and a review of the record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is
entitled to compensation. This matter shall now proceed to the damages phase.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Mindy Michaels Roth
Mindy Michaels Roth
Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01732-1
Date issued/filed: 2022-10-11
Pages: 8
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 9/16/2022) regarding 61 DECISION - Proffer. Signed by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth. (msg) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 8
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1732V
Filed: September 16, 2022
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
RICHARD PORPORA, * UNPUBLISHED
*
Petitioner, * Decision on Proffer;
* Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”);
v. * Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine.
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Maximillian Muller, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Lara Englund, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON PROFFER1
Roth, Special Master:
On November 7, 2019, Richard Porpora [“Mr. Porpora or “petitioner”] filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that
he developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on
September 25, 2017. Petition at 1, ECF No. 1.
On July 7, 2020, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that petitioner satisfied
the criteria necessary to qualify as a Table Injury under the Vaccine Injury Table. See Respondent’s
Report at 9, ECF No. 14.
1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of
Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone
with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of
confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request
redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance
and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be
available to the public. Id.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation,
all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
1

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 8
On July 8, 2020, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to
compensation for a Table Injury of GBS following the flu vaccine he received on September 25,
2017. ECF No. 15.
Respondent filed a proffer on September 16, 2022, agreeing to issue the following
payments:
1) A lump sum of $430,178.47, representing compensation for life care expenses
expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($166,564.67), pain and
suffering ($250,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($13,613.80), in the
form of a check payable to petitioner, Richard Porpora.
2) A lump sum payment of $158,391.48, representing compensation for satisfaction
of a New York State Department of Health Medicaid Lien, payable jointly to
petitioner and the New York State Department of Health.
3) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in Section
II.C. of the attached proffer.
Proffer, ECF No. 60.
I adopt the parties’ proffer attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on
the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with
this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Mindy Michaels Roth
Mindy Michaels Roth
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the
right to seek review.
2

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 3 of 8
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
RICHARD PORPORA,
Petitioner, No. 19-1732V
Special Master Mindy Michael Roth
v. ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On November 7, 2019, Richard Porpora (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34
(“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that he suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as a
result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on September 25, 2017.
Petition (ECF No. 1). On July 7, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services
(“respondent”) filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is entitled to compensation
under the Act. ECF No. 14. On July 8, 2020, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement
finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 15.
I. Items of Compensation
A. Life Care Items
Respondent engaged life care planner Laura Fox, MSN, BSN, RN, CLCP, and petitioner
engaged life care planner Roberta Hurley, Hurley Consulting, to provide an estimation of
petitioner’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term
“vaccine related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report. All items of

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 4 of 8
compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by
the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Richard Porpora, attached hereto as
Tab A. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded all items of compensation set
forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.
B. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $250,000.00 in actual pain and
suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
C. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $13,613.80. Petitioner agrees.
D. New York State Department of Health Medicaid Lien
Respondent proffers that Richard Porpora should be awarded funds to satisfy a New York
State Department of Health Medicaid Lien in the amount of $158,391.48, which represents full
satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action may have
against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the New York State Department of
Health has made to or on behalf of Richard Porpora from the date of his eligibility for benefits
through the date of judgment in this case as a result of his vaccine-related injury suffered on or
about September 25, 2017, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.
2

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 5 of 8
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,
and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1
A. A lump sum payment of $430,178.47, representing compensation for life care
expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($166,564.67), pain and
suffering ($250,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($13,613.80) in the form of a check
payable to petitioner, Richard Porpora.
B.A lump sum payment of $158,391.48, representing compensation for satisfaction of a
New York State Department of Health Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and
NEW YORK STATE DEPT OF HEALTH
Warren County Department of Social Services
Attn: Resource Department
1340 State Route 9
Lake George, NY 12804
SS#: ***-**-5106
Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the New York State Department of Health.
C. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract,2 subject to the conditions
described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan,
as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company3 from
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses and future pain and suffering.
2 In respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one
or more life insurance companies.
3 The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus,
exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company must have
one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:
3

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 6 of 8
which the annuity will be purchased.4 Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through
respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner,
Richard Porpora, only so long as petitioner is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At
the Secretary’s sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly,
quarterly, annual or other installments. The “annual amounts” set forth in the chart at Tab A
describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be
made in one annual installment.
1. Growth Rate
Respondent proffers that a four percent (4%) growth rate should be applied to all non-
medical life care items, and a five percent (5%) growth rate should be applied to all medical life
care items. Thus, the benefits illustrated in the chart at Tab A that are to be paid through annuity
payments should grow as follows: four percent (4%) compounded annually from the date of
judgment for non-medical items, and five percent (5%) compounded annually from the date of
judgment for medical items. Petitioner agrees.
a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;
b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;
c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-,
AA, AA+, or AAA;
d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability
Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.
4 Petitioner authorizes the disclosure of certain documents filed by the petitioner in this case
consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056.
4

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 7 of 8
2. Life-contingent annuity
Petitioner will continue to receive the annuity payments from the Life Insurance
Company only so long as he, Richard Porpora, is alive at the time that a particular payment is
due. Written notice shall be provided to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the
Life Insurance Company within twenty (20) days of Richard Porpora’s death.
3. Guardianship
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. Lump Sum paid to petitioner, Richard Porpora: $430,178.47
B. Medicaid lien: $158,391.48
C. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described
above in section II.C.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN M. BOYNTON
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C.SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
DARRYL R. WISHARD
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
5

Case 1:19-vv-01732-UNJ Document 65 Filed 10/11/22 Page 8 of 8
s/ LARA A. ENGLUND
LARA A. ENGLUND
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 307-3013
E-mail: lara.a.englund@usdoj.gov
Dated: September 16, 2022
6