VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01695 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01695 Petitioner: Kathy Stopar Filed: 2019-10-31 Decided: 2022-05-03 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2016-11-05 Condition: left shoulder injury related to a vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 100614 AI-assisted case summary: Kathy Stopar filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 31, 2019, alleging that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) caused by an influenza vaccine she received on November 5, 2016. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report on October 6, 2021, conceding that Petitioner met the criteria for a presumed SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table and was entitled to compensation. A ruling on entitlement was issued on October 7, 2021, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On March 18, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, indicating that Petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00 for pain and suffering and $8,114.63 for past unreimbursable expenses, totaling $100,614.63. Petitioner agreed with this proffered award. The Chief Special Master issued a decision awarding damages on May 3, 2022, granting a lump sum payment of $100,614.63 to Kathy Stopar. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01695-0 Date issued/filed: 2021-11-09 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/07/2021) regarding 42 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 44 Filed 11/09/21 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1695V UNPUBLISHED KATHY STOPAR, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 7, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Edward M. Kraus, Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On October 31, 2019, Kathy Stopar filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to a vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) caused by a November 5, 2016 influenza vaccine. Petition at ¶¶ 1. Petitioner further alleges that her shoulder pain has persisted for more than six months, that no party has received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine0ralted injuries, that that the vaccine was administered within the United States. Petition at ¶¶ 1, 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 44 Filed 11/09/21 Page 2 of 2 On October 6, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent has concluded that Petitioner meets the criteria for a presumed SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01695-1 Date issued/filed: 2022-05-03 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/24/2022) regarding 52 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 56 Filed 05/03/22 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1695V UNPUBLISHED KATHY J. STOPAR, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 24, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Edward M. Kraus, Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On October 31, 2019, Kathy J. Stopar filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 5, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 7, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On March 18, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00 for pain and suffering an $8,114.63 for past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 56 Filed 05/03/22 Page 2 of 5 Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $100,614.63 comprised of $92,500.00 for pain and suffering and $8,114.63 for past unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 56 Filed 05/03/22 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) KATHY J. STOPAR, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 19-1695V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On October 31, 2019, Kathy J. Stopar (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. Petitioner alleges that she suffered “injuries” as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on November 5, 2016. On October 6, 2021, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, recommending that compensation be awarded to petitioner for a presumed Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). On October 7, 2021, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 56 Filed 05/03/22 Page 4 of 5 awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $8,114.63. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $100,614.63, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Kathy J. Stopar. III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Kathy J. Stopar: $100,614.63. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:19-vv-01695-UNJ Document 56 Filed 05/03/22 Page 5 of 5 s/Traci R. Patton TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 353-1589 E-mail: Traci.Patton@usdoj.gov Dated: March 18, 2022 3