VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01491
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01491
Petitioner: J.O.
Filed: 2020-02-18
Decided: 2020-06-02
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2016-09-27
Condition: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 9050

AI-assisted case summary:
Brian and Heather Oberschmid, as parents and natural guardians of their minor child J.O., filed a petition for compensation on September 26, 2019, alleging that J.O. suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after receiving an influenza vaccination on September 27, 2016. The petition was filed under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report on February 13, 2020, conceding that J.O.'s GBS met the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, specifically that the onset of GBS occurred between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there was no apparent alternative cause. The respondent further agreed that the petitioners satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. On February 18, 2020, Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement, finding J.O. entitled to compensation based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record. Subsequently, on April 30, 2020, the respondent filed a proffer on the award of compensation. Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a decision on June 2, 2020, awarding compensation based on this proffer. The award included a lump sum of $434.00 for future unreimbursable expenses, payable to petitioners as legal representatives of J.O. It also included a lump sum of $8,616.40 for past unreimbursable expenses, payable to petitioners. Additionally, an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity for pain and suffering was awarded. This annuity will provide annual payments of $24,548.60 for six years certain, beginning August 8, 2033, for the benefit of J.O. The total lump sum for past and future unreimbursable expenses was $9,050.00. The decision noted that at the time the annuity payments would be received, J.O. would be an adult, and guardianship would not be required. Petitioners were represented by Kate Gerayne Westad of SiebenCarey, and the respondent was represented by Laurie Wiesner of the U.S. Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or the mechanism of causation beyond the Table definition.

Theory of causation field:
The petitioner alleged that J.O. suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after receiving an influenza vaccination on September 27, 2016. The respondent conceded that J.O.'s GBS met the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (QAI), which afford a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative cause. The respondent agreed that petitioners satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. The case resulted in a ruling on entitlement on February 18, 2020, and a damages decision on June 2, 2020, awarding $434.00 for future unreimbursable expenses, $8,616.40 for past unreimbursable expenses, and an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity for pain and suffering. The total lump sum for unreimbursable expenses was $9,050.00. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran presided over the case. Petitioners were represented by Kate Gerayne Westad, and respondent was represented by Laurie Wiesner. The public text does not detail specific medical experts, alternative causation arguments, or the precise mechanism of injury beyond the Table presumption.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01491-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-03-25
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 02/18/2020) regarding 17 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 20 Filed 03/25/20 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1491V
UNPUBLISHED
BRIAN OBERSCHMID and HEATHER Chief Special Master Corcoran
OBERSCHMID, as parents and natural
guardians of minor child, J.O., Filed: February 18, 2020
Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU);
v. Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Kate Gerayne Westad, SiebenCarey, Minneapolis, MN, for petitioner.
Laurie Wiesner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On September 26, 2019, Brian and Heather Oberschmid filed a petition for
compensation, on behalf of their minor child, J.O., under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners
allege that J.O. suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), which meets the Table
definition for GBS, after receiving the influenza vaccination on September 27, 2016.
Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 12. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 20 Filed 03/25/20 Page 2 of 2
On February 13, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
concedes that Petitioners are entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule
4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes “that petitioners have satisfied the
criteria set forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and
Aids to Interpretation (QAI), which afford petitioners a presumption of causation if the
onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination
and there is no apparent alternative cause.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that
“based on the current record, petitioners have satisfied all legal prerequisites for
compensation under the Act.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01491-1
Date issued/filed: 2020-06-02
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 04/30/2020) regarding 25 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1491V
UNPUBLISHED
BRIAN OBERSCHMID and HEATHER Chief Special Master Corcoran
OBERSCHMID, as parents and natural
guardians of minor child, J.O., Filed: April 30, 2020
Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU);
v. Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Barre Syndrome (GBS)
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Kate Gerayne Westad, SiebenCarey, Minneapolis, MN, for petitioner.
Laurie Wiesner, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On September 26, 2019, Brian and Heather Oberschmid filed a petition for
compensation, on behalf of their minor child, J.O., under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners
alleged that J.O. suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”), which meets the Table
definition for GBS, after receiving the influenza vaccination on September 27, 2016.
Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 12. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.
On February 18, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioners
entitled to compensation for J.O.’s GBS. On April 30, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 7
on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioners should be awarded
compensation in the amount of $434.00 for future unreimburseable expenses, in the
amount of $8,616.40 for past unreimburseable expenses, and an amount sufficient to
purchase the annuity described in II.C. for pain and suffering. Proffer at 2-3. In the
Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioners agree with the proffered award. Id. at
2-4. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioners are entitled to an award as
stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award the following:
A. A lump sum in the amount of $434.00, representing compensation for
projected unreimburseable expenses, in the form of a check payable to
Petitioners as legal representatives of J.O.;
B. A lump sum in the amount of $8,616.40, representing compensation for
actual unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to
Petitioners; and
C. A lump sum sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in
Section II.C of the Proffer, representing compensation for pain and
suffering.
These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under
§ 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 3 of 7
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
__________________________________________
)
BRIAN OBERSCHMID and HEATHER )
OBERSCHMID, as Parents and Natural )
Guardians of Minor Child, J.O., )
)
Petitioners, ) No. 19-1491V
v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
__________________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Procedural History
On September 26, 2019, petitioners filed a petition for compensation (“petition”) under
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, as amended.
Petitioners allege that J.O. suffered “problems and limitations related to Guillain-Barré
Syndrome” (“GBS”) which was caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccination J.O. received on
September 27, 2016. See Petition (“Pet.”) at ¶1-4. On February 13, 2020, respondent filed his
Vaccine Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that J.O.’s alleged injury meets the Table criteria for GBS
and that petitioners have satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. On
February 18, 2020, the Chief Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that in view
of respondent’s position and evidence of record, petitioners were entitled to compensation.
1

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 4 of 7
II. Items of Compensation and Form of the Award
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers, and the parties recommend, that
compensation be made through lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described
below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the
following:1
A. Future Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioners supports an award for limited projected medical
expenses related to J.O.’s vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioners be
awarded unreimbursable expenses in the lump sum amount of $434.00, in the form of a check
payable to petitioners as the legal representatives of J.O. Petitioners agree.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioners documents their expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to J.O.’s vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioners should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the lump sum amount of $8,616.40, in the form of a
check payable to petitioners. Petitioners agree.
C. Past Pain and Suffering
For past pain and suffering, respondent proffers an amount sufficient to purchase an
annuity contract, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased
1 Should J.O. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the
Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
2

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 5 of 7
(the “Life Insurance Company”),2 for the benefit of J.O., pursuant to which the Life Insurance
Company will agree to make payments to J.O. as follows:
Beginning August 8, 2033, $24,548.60 payable annually for six years certain.
The payments provided for in this section II. C. above shall be made as set forth herein.
Should J.O. predecease any of the certain payments set forth above, said payments shall be made
to his estate. Written notice to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and to the Life
Insurance Company shall be provided within twenty (20) days of J.O.’s death.
The annuity contract will be owned solely and exclusively by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and will be purchased as soon as practicable following the entry of a judgment
in conformity with this Proffer. The parties agree that upon the purchase of the annuity contract,
the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the United States of America are released from
any and all obligations with respect to future annuity payments.
2 Notwithstanding references herein to “the Life Insurance Company” or “the annuity contract,”
to satisfy the conditions set forth herein, in respondent’s sole and absolute discretion, respondent
may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies.
Moreover, the Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and
surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company
must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:
a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;
b. Moody’s Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;
c. Standard and Poor’s Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-,
AA, AA+, or AAA;
d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating:
AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.
3

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 6 of 7
Petitioners authorize respondent to disclose documents filed by petitioners in this case
consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056.
The compensation described above in Sections A., B., and C. represents all elements of
compensation to which petitioners are entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioners
agree.3
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. Lump sum to petitioners as legal representatives of J.O.
(for future unreimbursable expenses): $ 434.00
B. Lump sum to petitioners (for past unreimbursable expenses): $8,616.40
C. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described
above in section II. C.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH H. HUNT
Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
3 At the time the annuity payments will be received, J.O. will be an adult, and thus
guardianship is not required.
4

Case 1:19-vv-01491-UNJ Document 29 Filed 06/02/20 Page 7 of 7
/s/Laurie Wiesner
LAURIE WIESNER
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 305-0253
laurie.wiesner@usdoj.gov
Dated: April 30, 2020
5