VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01277
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01277
Petitioner: J’nhia Rutledge
Filed: 2019-08-26
Decided: 2020-09-25
Vaccine: HPV
Vaccination date: 2019-08-25
Condition: fatigue and body aches
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
J’nhia Rutledge filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on August 26, 2019, alleging that she developed fatigue and body aches as a result of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine she received on August 25, 2019. The Special Master noted that the petition was filed on August 26, 2019, alleging injury from an HPV vaccine administered on August 25, 2019. The Special Master issued an initial order on August 27, 2019, setting a deadline of September 26, 2019, for the petitioner to submit medical records and a statement of completion. Petitioner's counsel filed a status report on September 26, 2019, stating that records were being gathered and requested an additional ninety days. The deadline was extended to December 26, 2019. On December 26, 2019, petitioner filed a motion for a twenty-day extension, which was granted, setting a new deadline of January 15, 2020. Petitioner did not file medical records by this deadline but instead filed a status report indicating that counsel was unable to obtain necessary records due to the petitioner's lack of cooperation. On February 7, 2020, the Special Master issued a show cause order, giving petitioner a final deadline of March 9, 2020, to file medical records, warning that failure to do so would result in dismissal. Petitioner did not file any medical records by the March 9, 2020 deadline, and no further filings or correspondence were received from the petitioner. The Special Master found that the record did not contain evidence of a "Table Injury" or persuasive evidence that the alleged injuries were caused by the HPV vaccine. The Special Master noted that compensation cannot be awarded based solely on claims and must be supported by medical records or a physician's opinion. The petitioner failed to submit any medical records despite multiple opportunities. The Special Master also considered the COVID-19 pandemic's potential impact on obtaining records but found that the petitioner had had 331 days to submit records and had indicated an unwillingness or inability to cooperate with counsel. Consequently, the case was dismissed for insufficient proof and failure to prosecute. The decision was issued by Special Master Herbrina Sanders on September 25, 2020. Petitioner was represented by Richard Gage of Richard Gage, P.C., and Respondent was represented by Kimberly S. Davey of the United States Department of Justice. No award was made.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner J’nhia Rutledge alleged that she developed fatigue and body aches as a result of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine received on August 25, 2019. The petition was filed on August 26, 2019. The Special Master Herbrina Sanders dismissed the case on September 25, 2020, for failure to prosecute and insufficient proof. The petitioner failed to submit any medical records or other evidence to support her claim, despite multiple extensions and a final show cause order. The public decision does not describe the specific mechanism of causation, any medical experts, or the petitioner's age at vaccination. The dismissal was based on the lack of evidence and failure to prosecute, not on a determination of the merits of the causation theory. Petitioner was represented by Richard Gage, P.C., and Respondent by the United States Department of Justice.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01277-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-09-25
Pages: 3
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/24/2020) regarding 15 DECISION of Special Master. Signed by Special Master Herbrina Sanders. (arm) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-01277-UNJ Document 17 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 3
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
Filed: July 24, 2020
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
J’NHIA RUTLEDGE, * No. 19-1277V
*
Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders
*
v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Dismissal; Failure to Prosecute; Insufficient
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Proof; Human Papilloma Virus (“HPV”)
* Vaccine; Fatigue and Body Aches
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne, WY, for Petitioner.
Kimberly S. Davey, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DISMISSAL1
On August 26, 2019, J’nhia Rutledge (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program” or “Program”).
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that she developed “fatigue and body
aches” as a result of the Human Papilloma Virus (“HPV”) vaccine she received on August 25,
2019. The information in the record, however, does not show entitlement to an award under the
Program.
I. Procedural History
On August 27, 2019, I issued the initial order in this case and set a deadline of September
26, 2019, for Petitioner to submit her medical records and a statement of completion. Initial Order at
1, ECF No. 5. On September 26, 2019, Petitioner’s counsel filed a status report explaining that he “
was contacted by Petitioner within days of her statute of limitations for filing a claim in the [V]accine
[P]rogram. Therefore, [he] has not yet obtained the medical records regarding Petitioner’s injury but
is working with Petitioner to gather them.” Status Report, ECF No. 10 at 1. Petitioner requested an
additional ninety days to submit her records. Id. Respondent did not object, and I set a new deadline
1 This decision shall be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to
the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete
medical or other information that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the
rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I
agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, such material will be
deleted from public access.

Case 1:19-vv-01277-UNJ Document 17 Filed 09/25/20 Page 2 of 3
of December 26, 2019, for Petitioner to submit her medical records. Informal Comm., docketed Sept.
27, 2019; Non-PDF Order, docketed Sept. 27, 2019.
On December 26, 2019, Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time requesting an
additional twenty days to file her medical records. Mot. for Ext. of Time, ECF No. 11. I granted
Petitioner’s motion and set the new deadline of January 15, 2020, for Petitioner to file her medical
records. Non-PDF Order, docketed Jan. 6, 2020.
Petitioner did not file any medical records by her January 15, 2020 deadline. Rather, she
filed a status report indicating that her “[c]ounsel has been unable to obtain the necessary records in
this case due to lack of cooperation from Petitioner.” Status Report at 1, ECF No. 12. Petitioner did
not provide any additional information in her status report. See id.
On February 7, 2020, I issued a show cause order giving Petitioner a final opportunity to
show cause why her case should nt be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Show Cause Order, ECF
No. 13. In my order, I gave Petitioner a final deadline of March 9, 2020, to file medical records in
support of her claim. Id. at 2. I warned Petitioner that if she failed to file medical records by this
deadline, I would dismiss her claim. Id.
Petitioner did not file any medical records by her March 9, 2020 deadline. The Court has not
received any additional filings or correspondence from Petitioner since her January 15, 2020 status
report.
II. Analysis
To receive compensation under the Program, Petitioner must prove either (1) that she
suffered a “Table Injury”—i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table—corresponding
to the vaccination, or (2) that she suffered an injury that was actually caused by a vaccine. See
§§ 13(a)(1)(A), 11(c)(1). An examination of the record did not uncover any evidence that
Petitioner suffered a “Table Injury.” Further, the record does not contain persuasive evidence
that Petitioner’s alleged injuries were caused by the HPV vaccine.
Under the Act, petitioners may not be given a Program award based solely on their claims
alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by medical records or the opinion of a competent
physician. § 13(a)(1). In this case, Petitioner has not submitted any medical records in support of
her claim despite numerous opportunities to do so. When a petitioner fails to comply with Court
orders to prosecute her case, the Court may dismiss her claim. Vaccine Rule 21(b)(1); Sapharas v.
Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 35 Fed. Cl. 503 (1996); Tsekouras v. Sec’y of Health & Human
Servs., 26 Cl. Ct. 439 (1992), aff’d, 991 F.2d 810 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (table); see also Claude E. Atkins
Enters., Inc. v. United States, 899 F.2d 1180, 1183–85 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (affirming dismissal for
failure to prosecute for counsel’s failure to submit pre-trial memorandum); Adkins v. United States,
816 F.2d 1580, 1583 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (affirming dismissal for failure of a party to respond to
discovery requests).
2

Case 1:19-vv-01277-UNJ Document 17 Filed 09/25/20 Page 3 of 3
In light of the COVID-19 global pandemic and potential issues obtaining medical records
from providers in a timely manner, I provided Petitioner additional time to file records in support
of her claim. To date, Petitioner has had three hundred and thirty-one days to submit medical
records in support of her claim. She has indicated in a status report that she is either unwilling or
unable to cooperate with her counsel to obtain the necessary records for her case to proceed.
Therefore, this case must be dismissed for insufficient proof. The Clerk shall enter judgment
accordingly.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Herbrina D. Sanders
Herbrina D. Sanders
Special Master
2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of a notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
3