Joy M. Freiberg v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2021)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Joy M. Freiberg filed a petition for compensation on August 14, 2019, alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on October 3, 2018.
Ms. Freiberg stated the vaccine was administered in the United States, that the injury caused residual effects for more than six months, and that she had no prior award or settlement for this condition.
The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Ms. Freiberg sustained a SIRVA Table injury, denied that the vaccine caused her alleged injury or any other injury, and denied that her current condition was a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.
Despite these denials, the parties filed a joint stipulation on November 3, 2021, agreeing to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H.
Corcoran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as his decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Ms.
Freiberg was awarded $30,182.00 as compensation for all damages, to be paid as a lump sum in the form of a check. This amount represents a compromise of the parties' respective positions on liability and damages.
The decision was issued on December 3, 2021. Petitioner was represented by Richard H.
Moeller of Moore, Heffernan, et al., and respondent was represented by Jennifer A. Shah of the U.S.
Department of Justice.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Joy M. Freiberg alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccine received on October 3, 2018. The respondent denied that the vaccine caused the alleged injury or that it was a SIRVA Table injury. The parties reached a joint stipulation to settle the case. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding petitioner $30,182.00 as compensation for all damages. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the clinical progression of the condition. The award represents a compromise of liability and damages. Petitioner was represented by Richard H. Moeller, and respondent by Jennifer A. Shah. The decision date was December 3, 2021.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-01196