VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00960 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00960 Petitioner: Wilian Machado Filed: 2019-07-02 Decided: 2021-03-29 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2018-10-13 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 50600 AI-assisted case summary: Wilian Machado filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination on October 13, 2018. The respondent conceded that Mr. Machado's injury was consistent with a SIRVA injury as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table and that the residual effects had lasted for more than six months. Based on this concession and the evidence of record, the court found Mr. Machado entitled to compensation. Subsequently, the parties submitted a proffer on damages. The respondent recommended an award of $50,600.63, comprising $50,000.00 for pain and suffering and $600.63 for past unreimbursable expenses. Mr. Machado agreed with this proffered award. The court accepted the proffer and awarded Mr. Machado a lump sum payment of $50,600.63, representing compensation for all damages available under the Vaccine Act. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00960-0 Date issued/filed: 2020-12-09 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 11/05/2020) regarding 20 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00960-UNJ Document 23 Filed 12/09/20 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0960V UNPUBLISHED WILIAN MACHADO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: November 5, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Kristina E. Grigorian, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner. Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On July 2, 2019, Wilian Machado filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on October 13, 2018. Petition at 1, 5. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On November 5, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent “believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a SIRVA injury, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table”. Id. at 3-4. Respondent further 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00960-UNJ Document 23 Filed 12/09/20 Page 2 of 2 agrees that Petitioner has suffered the residual effect of his condition for more than six months. Id. at 4. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00960-1 Date issued/filed: 2021-03-29 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 02/23/2021) regarding 27 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00960-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0960V UNPUBLISHED WILIAN MACHADO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 23, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Kristina E. Grigorian, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner. Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On July 2, 2019, Wilian Machado filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 13, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On November 5, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On February 23, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $50,600.63 (comprised of $50,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering and $600.63 for past unreimbursable expenses). Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00960-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 4 Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $$50,600.63 (comprised of $50,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering and $600.63 for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:19-vv-00960-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/29/21 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS WILIAN MACHADO, Petitioner, No. 19-960V v. Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. PROFFER ON AWARD OF DAMAGES On July 2, 2019, Wilian Machado (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to - 34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. Petitioner alleged that he suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) following his receipt of an influenza vaccine on October 13, 20178. Respondent conceded that petitioner’s alleged injury satisfies the criteria of the Vaccine Injury Table, and therefore conceded petitioner’s entitlement to compensation in his Rule 4(c) Report filed on November 5, 2020. Based on Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report the Court found petitioner entitled to compensation. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable 1 Case 1:19-vv-00960-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/29/21 Page 4 of 4 expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $600.63. Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $50,600.63, in the form of a check made payable to petitioner. 1 This lump sum payment represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Acting Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Jennifer L. Reynaud JENNIFER L. REYNAUD Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Date: February 23, 2021 Tel: (202) 305-1586 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. 2