VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00903 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00903 Petitioner: Brad Bundesen Filed: 2019-06-20 Decided: 2020-12-02 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2017-11-03 Condition: Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 52981 AI-assisted case summary: Brad Bundesen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that he suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on November 3, 2017. The respondent conceded that Mr. Bundesen was entitled to compensation, agreeing that he met the criteria for a Table injury. Specifically, the respondent noted that Mr. Bundesen had no prior history of shoulder issues, his pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 hours of the vaccination, his symptoms were limited to the vaccinated shoulder, and no other condition explained his symptoms. The case proceeded as a Table claim. Subsequently, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Mr. Bundesen entitled to compensation. A proffer on award of compensation was filed, indicating that Mr. Bundesen should be awarded a total of $52,981.25. This amount consisted of $52,500.00 for pain and suffering and $481.25 for past unreimbursed expenses. Mr. Bundesen agreed with this proffered award. The court issued a decision awarding Mr. Bundesen a lump sum payment of $52,981.25. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00903-0 Date issued/filed: 2020-11-16 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 10/15/2020) regarding 24 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0903V UNPUBLISHED BRAD BUNDESEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 15, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Kyle Edward Pozza, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On June 20, 2019, Brad Bundesen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on November 3, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 15, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 29 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 2 Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (QAI); petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation or dysfunction in his left shoulder; his pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; his symptoms were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain his initial symptoms.” Id. at 5. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00903-1 Date issued/filed: 2020-12-02 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/28/2020) regarding 28 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0903V UNPUBLISHED BRAD BUNDESEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 28, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Kyle Edward Pozza, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 20, 2019, Brad Bundesen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered he suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on November 3, 2017. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that his injury lasted longer than six months. Petition at 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 28, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On October 28, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of $52,981.25, consisting of $52,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $481.25 for past unreimbursed 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 5 expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $52,981.25, consisting of $52,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $481.25 for past unreimbursed expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/02/20 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) BRAD BUNDESEN, ) No. 19-903V ) Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On October 15, 2020, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Thereafter, on the same date, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for his Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) and related sequela. I. Amount of Compensation Respondent now proffers that, based on the Chief Special Master’s entitlement decision and the evidence of record, petitioner should be awarded $52,981.25. The award is comprised of the following: $52,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $481.25 for past unreimbursed expenses. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. 1 Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/02/20 Page 4 of 5 II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made as described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s damages decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1 A. Petitioner’s Damages Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through: a lump sum of $52,981.25, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. B. Guardianship Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 2 Case 1:19-vv-00903-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/02/20 Page 5 of 5 /s/ KYLE E. POZZA_________ Kyle E. Pozza Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3661 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: kyle.pozza@usdoj.gov Dated: October 28, 2020 3