VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00741 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00741 Petitioner: Tina Coppersmith Filed: 2019-05-17 Decided: 2020-09-30 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2018-03-30 Condition: Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 55533 AI-assisted case summary: Tina Coppersmith filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on May 17, 2019, alleging she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of her influenza vaccination on March 30, 2018. The respondent conceded that Ms. Coppersmith is entitled to compensation, agreeing that her injury met the criteria for SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, the respondent noted that she had no recent history of shoulder issues, the pain onset was within 48 hours of vaccination, the pain was limited to the vaccinated shoulder, and no other condition explained the pain. The respondent also agreed that she suffered residual effects for more than six months. Based on this concession and the evidence, entitlement was granted. Subsequently, on September 30, 2020, a decision awarding damages was issued. The respondent proffered an award of $55,533.04, comprising $55,000.00 for pain and suffering and $533.04 for past unreimbursed medical expenses, which Ms. Coppersmith agreed to. The court awarded this amount as compensation for all damages. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00741-0 Date issued/filed: 2020-09-24 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 08/24/2020) regarding 22 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00741-UNJ Document 33 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-741V UNPUBLISHED TINA COPPERSMITH, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 24, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On May 17, 2019, Tina Coppersmith filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of her March 30, 2018 influneza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On August 24, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent indicates that 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00741-UNJ Document 33 Filed 09/24/20 Page 2 of 2 [i]t is Respondent’s position that Petitioner suffered SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, Petitioner had no recent history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder that would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings and/or diagnostic studies occurring after vaccine injection; the onset of pain occurred within forty-eight hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; the pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and, no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain Petitioner’s left shoulder pain. Id. at 4-5 (citing 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(10).) Respondent further agrees that “Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months.” Id. at 5 (citing 11(c)(1)(D)(i)). In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00741-1 Date issued/filed: 2020-09-30 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/28/2020) regarding 27 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00741-UNJ Document 34 Filed 09/30/20 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-741V UNPUBLISHED TINA WILKEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 28, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On May 17, 2019, Tina Wilken filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her March 30, 2018 influneza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. See Petition at ¶¶2, 11-13. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On August 24, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On August 26, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00741-UNJ Document 34 Filed 09/30/20 Page 2 of 4 compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $55,533.04. This is comprised of pain and suffering ($55,000.00) and past unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses ($533.04). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $55,533.04 (comprised of pain and suffering ($55,000.00) and past unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses ($533.04)) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:19-vv-00741-UNJ Document 34 Filed 09/30/20 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ___________________________________ ) TINA WILKEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 19-741V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items On August 24, 2020, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) injury suffered following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on March 30, 2018. On August 24, 2020, a Ruling on Entitlement, adopting respondent’s recommendation, was issued. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner1 should be awarded $55,533.04. This is comprised of pain and suffering ($55,000) and past unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses ($533.04), and represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2 Petitioner agrees. 1 Petitioner is a competent adult, therefore evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 2 Should Petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. Case 1:19-vv-00741-UNJ Document 34 Filed 09/30/20 Page 4 of 4 II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through: a lump sum of $55,533.04 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. Respectfully submitted, ETHAN P. DAVIS Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ JAMES V. LOPEZ James V. Lopez Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3655 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: james.lopez@usdoj.gov Dated: August 26, 2020