VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00306 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00306 Petitioner: Gail R. Zuvich Filed: 2019-02-26 Decided: 2020-12-09 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2017-10-08 Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 27975 AI-assisted case summary: Gail R. Zuvich filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on February 26, 2019. She alleged that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine received on October 8, 2017. Ms. Zuvich stated that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that she suffered residual effects of the injury for more than six months, and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that petitioner sustained a SIRVA injury within the Table time period and further denied that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer a left shoulder injury or any other injury or her current condition. Despite the respondent's denial, the parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation on November 4, 2020. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as his decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Ms. Zuvich was awarded a lump sum of $27,975.00, payable to Petitioner, for all items of damages. The decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical examinations, treatments, or expert witnesses. Petitioner was represented by Jimmy A. Zgheib of Zgheib Sayad, P.C., and respondent was represented by Dhairya Divyakant Jani of the U.S. Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Gail R. Zuvich alleged a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccine on October 8, 2017. Respondent denied the injury occurred within the Table time period and denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran adopted the stipulation, awarding $27,975.00. The public decision does not detail the specific theory of causation, medical experts, or the mechanism of injury, stating only that the respondent denied causation and the injury occurred within the Table time period. The award was based on a joint stipulation. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00306-0 Date issued/filed: 2020-12-09 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/04/2020) regarding 26 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0306V UNPUBLISHED GAIL R. ZUVICH, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: November 4, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA) Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner. Dhairya Divyakant Jani, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On February 26, 2019, Gail R. Zuvich filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 8, 2017. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at November 4, 2020, ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, she suffered the residual effects of the injury for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition. Petition at 1, 5-6; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA injury within the Table time period, and further denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer a left shoulder injury or any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on November 4, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $27,975.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 3 of 7 Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 4 of 7 Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 5 of 7 Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 6 of 7 Case 1:19-vv-00306-UNJ Document 30 Filed 12/09/20 Page 7 of 7