VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00197
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00197
Petitioner: Ernestine Harris
Filed: 2019-02-04
Decided: 2020-08-25
Vaccine: Tdap
Vaccination date: 2017-09-28
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 71285

AI-assisted case summary:
Ernestine Harris filed a claim under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination administered on September 28, 2017. The respondent conceded that Ms. Harris is entitled to compensation, agreeing that her injury was a Table injury and that no other causes were identified. The respondent also agreed that the statutory six-month sequela requirement was satisfied. Following the ruling on entitlement, the parties submitted a proffer for the award of compensation. The respondent recommended, and Ms. Harris agreed, to an award of $71,285.12, which included $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,285.12 for past unreimbursable expenses. The Chief Special Master issued a decision awarding this amount as a lump sum payment to Ms. Harris.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00197-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-08-05
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 07/02/2020) regarding 30 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 37 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-0197V
UNPUBLISHED
ERNESTINE HARRIS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: July 2, 2020
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria
acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;
Respondent. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On February 4, 2019, Ernestine Harris filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”
vaccination administered on September 28, 2017. Petition at 1,5. The case was
assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 30, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 37 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 2
at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that Petitioner suffered a Table injury and
states that “[n]o other causes for [P]etitioner’s SIRVA were identified.” Id. at 6.
Respondent further agrees that the statutory six month sequela requirement has been
satisfied. Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_19-vv-00197-1
Date issued/filed: 2020-08-25
Pages: 5
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/24/2020) regarding 33 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 38 Filed 08/25/20 Page 1 of 5
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-00197V
UNPUBLISHED
ERNESTINE HARRIS, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: July 24, 2020
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
Respondent. Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On February 4, 2019, Ernestine Harris filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”)
vaccination administered on September 28, 2017. Petition at 1, 5. The case was
assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On July 2, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
compensation for SIRVA. On July 24, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of
compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $71,285.12
(comprised of $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,285.12 for past unreimbursable
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 38 Filed 08/25/20 Page 2 of 5
expenses). Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner
agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $71,285.12 (comprised of $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and
$1,285.12 for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to
Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 38 Filed 08/25/20 Page 3 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
ERNESTINE HARRIS, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 19-197V
v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )
SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On February 4, 2019, Ernestine Harris (“petitioner”) filed this claim under the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§
300aa-1 to -34, alleging that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
(“SIRVA”) as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine administered
to her on September 28, 2017. Petition at 1, 5. On June 30, 2020, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate
for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and on July 2, 2020, the
Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation.
ECF No. 29; ECF No. 30.
I. Items of Compensation
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering.
See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 38 Filed 08/25/20 Page 4 of 5
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,285.12. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $71,285.12, in the form of a
check payable to petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
Lump sum payable to petitioner, Ernestine Harris: $71,285.12
Respectfully submitted,
ETHAN P. DAVIS
Acting Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and
suffering.
2

Case 1:19-vv-00197-UNJ Document 38 Filed 08/25/20 Page 5 of 5
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ Claudia B. Gangi
CLAUDIA B. GANGI
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 616-4138
Email: claudia.gangi@usdoj.gov
Dated: July 24, 2020
3