Douglas F. Crawford v. HHS - Influenza, severe joint pains and reactive arthritis (2023)

Filed 2018-10-23Decided 2023-04-04Vaccine Influenza
compensated$38,700

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Douglas F. Crawford filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 23, 2018.

He alleged that he suffered severe joint pains and reactive arthritis caused by his influenza vaccination on December 8, 2017. Mr.

Crawford further alleged that the residual effects of his condition lasted for more than six months. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that Mr.

Crawford sustained the alleged injuries or that the flu vaccine caused them. Despite the respondent's denial, the parties filed a joint stipulation for damages on March 9, 2023.

Special Master Daniel T. Horner reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as the decision of the Court.

Pursuant to the stipulation, Mr. Crawford was awarded $38,700.00 as a lump sum payment to compensate for all items of damages.

The decision was issued on April 4, 2023. Petitioner's counsel was Jonathan Joseph Svitak of Shannon Law Group, P.C., and respondent's counsel was Katherine Carr Esposito of the U.S.

Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests performed, treatments received, or the specific mechanism of causation.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Douglas F. Crawford alleged that a December 8, 2017, influenza vaccination caused severe joint pains and reactive arthritis, with residual effects lasting over six months. The respondent denied the alleged injuries and causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation for damages, which was adopted by Special Master Daniel T. Horner. The stipulation resulted in an award of $38,700.00. The theory of causation was not adjudicated on the merits, as the case was resolved by stipulation. The public decision does not name specific medical experts or detail the proposed mechanism of injury, indicating an off-Table theory or lack of detailed clinical narrative in the public record. Petitioner was represented by Jonathan Joseph Svitak, and respondent by Katherine Carr Esposito. The decision date was April 4, 2023, following the stipulation filed March 9, 2023, with the petition filed October 23, 2018.

Source PDFs 3 total · 2 downloaded