VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01614
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01614
Petitioner: Frances Basler
Filed: 2018-10-18
Decided: 2020-08-27
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2015-10-15
Condition: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 286010.71

AI-assisted case summary:
Frances Basler received an influenza vaccination on October 15, 2015. She subsequently developed Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), alleging the onset occurred between three and forty-two days after vaccination, with no alternative cause, and symptoms lasting more than six months. The case was filed on October 18, 2018. Respondent conceded that Ms. Basler's claim qualified as a Table injury, satisfying the criteria for GBS following a seasonal flu vaccination. A ruling on entitlement was issued on July 17, 2020, finding her entitled to compensation. On August 27, 2020, a decision awarding damages was issued based on a proffer. Ms. Basler was awarded an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract for future life care expenses, insurance, and attendant care, plus a lump sum of $285,373.88 for past unreimbursed expenses and past and future pain and suffering. The total award, including the annuity, was calculated to be $28,601,071.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01614-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-08-18
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 07/17/2020) regarding 37 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 44 Filed 08/18/20 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1614V
UNPUBLISHED
FRANCES BASLER, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: July 17, 2020
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Respondent.
Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On October 18, 2018, Frances Basler filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on
October 15, 2015 and thereafter suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). See
Petition. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
Masters.
On July 17, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report
at 1. Specifically, it is Respondent’s position that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 44 Filed 08/18/20 Page 2 of 2
forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and Aids to
Interpretation (QAI), which afford petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of
GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there
is no apparent alternative cause. Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that the statutory
six-month sequela requirement has been required. Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01614-1
Date issued/filed: 2020-08-27
Pages: 6
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/27/2020) regarding 40 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 45 Filed 08/27/20 Page 1 of 6
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1614V
UNPUBLISHED
FRANCES BASLER, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: July 27, 2020
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Respondent.
Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On October 18, 2018, Frances Basler filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 15, 2015. See Petition.
Petitioner further alleges the onset of her GBS occurred between three and forty-two
days after her vaccination, that there is no alternative cause for her GBS, and that she
suffered symptoms related to her GBS for more than six months. Id. The case was
assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On July 17, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
compensation for GBS and related sequelae that she sustained following the
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 45 Filed 08/27/20 Page 2 of 6
administration of the vaccination. ECF 39. On July 27, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer
on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded:
1. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in
“Section A” of the attached Proffer, paid to the life insurance company from which
the annuity will be purchased (see also ECF 39 at 1-3); and
2. A lump sum in the amount of $285,373.88 in the form of a check payable to
Petitioner.3
In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered
award. ECF 39. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an
award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, I award Petitioner an amount
sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in “Section A” of the
attached Proffer and a lump sum payment of $285,373.88. This represents
compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 This sum consists of $54,737.00 for future life care plan expenses for the first year following the entry of
judgment; $636.88 for past unreimbursed expenses; and $230,000.00 for past and future pain and
suffering at net present value. ECF 39 at 3.
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 45 Filed 08/27/20 Page 3 of 6
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
FRANCES BASLER,
Petitioner,
v. No. 18-1614V
Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On July 17, 2020, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report, in which he recommended that
the Court find petitioner entitled to compensation, and on July 17, 2020, the Court entered its
Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. Specifically, based on
respondent’s recommendation, the Court found petitioner entitled to compensation for Guillain-
Barré syndrome and related sequelae that she sustained following the administration of an
influenza vaccination on October 15, 2015, and that petitioner’s claim satisfies the requirements
necessary to qualify as a Table injury under the Vaccine Injury Table. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
14(a)(XIV)(D), (c)(15). Respondent now proffers that petitioner receive an award as follows:
A. Life Care Items Beginning on the First Anniversary of Judgment.
Respondent proffers an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract described
below in this Section A of this Proffer, paid to the life insurance company from which the
annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).1
1 Notwithstanding references herein to “the Life Insurance Company” or “the annuity contract,”
to satisfy the conditions set forth herein, in respondent’s sole and absolute discretion, respondent
may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies.
1

Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 45 Filed 08/27/20 Page 4 of 6
The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract from
the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of petitioner, pursuant to which the Life Insurance
Company will agree to make payments periodically to petitioner for the following items of
compensation:
(a) For future insurance expenses, beginning on the first anniversary of the date
of judgment, an annual amount of $3,758.07 to be paid for the remainder of
petitioner’s life, all amounts increasing at the rate of four percent (4%),
compounded annually from the date of judgment;
(b) For medical care, ancillary services, equipment, and supplies, beginning on
the first anniversary of the date of judgment, an annual amount of $1,957.60 to be
paid for the remainder of petitioner’s life, all amounts increasing at the rate of
four percent (4%), compounded annually from the date of judgment; and
(c) For attendant care expenses, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of
judgment, an annual amount of $27,746.40 to be paid up to the anniversary of the
date of judgment in year 2024, then beginning on the anniversary of the date of
judgment in year 2024 an annual amount of $36,871.40 to be paid for the
remainder of petitioner’s life, all amounts increasing at the rate of four percent
(4%), compounded annually from the date of judgment.
At the sole discretion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the periodic
payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly, quarterly, annual or other installments. The
“annual amounts” set forth above describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and
do not require that the payment be made in one annual installment. Petitioner will continue to
Moreover, the Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and
surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company
must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:
a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;
b. Moody’s Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa;
c. Standard and Poor’s Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-,
AA, AA+, or AAA;
d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating:
AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.
2

Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 45 Filed 08/27/20 Page 5 of 6
receive the annuity payments from the Life Insurance Company only so long as petitioner is
alive at the time that a particular payment is due. Written notice to the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and the Life Insurance Company shall be provided within twenty (20) days of
petitioner’s death.
The annuity contract will be owned solely and exclusively by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and will be purchased as soon as practicable following the entry of a judgment
in conformity with this Proffer. The parties agree that upon the purchase of the annuity contract,
the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the United States of America are released from
any and all obligations with respect to future annuity payments.
Petitioner authorizes respondent to disclose documents filed by petitioner in this case
consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056.
B. Remaining Compensation for Damages Available under
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
In addition to the compensation proffered above in Section A of this Proffer, respondent
proffers a lump sum $285,373.88 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.2 This amount
represents all remaining compensation for damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa-15(a).3
2 This sum consists of $54,737.00 for future life care plan expenses for the first year following
the entry of judgment; $636.88 for past unreimbursed expenses; and $230,000.00 for past and
future pain and suffering at net present value.
3 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses and future pain and suffering. Petitioner makes no claim for future lost earnings.
3

Case 1:18-vv-01614-UNJ Document 45 Filed 08/27/20 Page 6 of 6
Petitioner has reviewed the foregoing and agrees with the proffered award as stated above
in Sections A and B of this Proffer.4
Respectfully submitted,
ETHAN P. DAVIS
Acting Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ RYAN D. PYLES
RYAN D. PYLES
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 616-9847
DATED: July 27, 2020
4 This proffer does not include any award for attorneys’ fees and costs that may be awarded
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).
4