VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01349
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01349
Petitioner: JENNIFER A. BROOKS
Filed: 
Decided: 2020-04-27
Vaccine: 
Vaccination date: 
Condition: 
Outcome: dismissed
Award amount USD: 

AI-assisted case summary:
Jennifer A. Brooks filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation. The specific vaccine and alleged injury are not detailed in this order. On April 27, 2020, both parties jointly stipulated to dismiss the action. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), Special Master Horner dismissed the case without prejudice, and no judgment was to be entered. The specific reasons for the dismissal were not detailed in this order, but it was a joint stipulation.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01349-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-04-27
Pages: 1
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 3/13/2020) regarding 26 Order Concluding Proceedings. Signed by Special Master Daniel T. Horner. (et) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-01349-UNJ Document 27 Filed 04/27/20 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1349V
Filed: March 31, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
Special Master Horner
JENNIFER A. BROOKS,
Petitioner,
Order Concluding Proceedings;
v.
Vaccine Rule 21(a)
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.
Heather Lynn Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
On March 31, 2020, petitioner filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, stating that
the “parties hereby stipulate pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) that this action shall be
dismissed.” (ECF No. 25.)
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), this case is hereby dismissed
without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall
not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Daniel T. Horner
Daniel T. Horner
Special Master
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, it will
be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, it will be
redacted from public access.