VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01300 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01300 Petitioner: Donna McGill Filed: 2018-08-28 Decided: 2020-02-13 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2017-10-06 Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 78465 AI-assisted case summary: Donna McGill filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on August 28, 2018, alleging she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on October 6, 2017. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report on July 31, 2019, conceding that petitioner's claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA and that she was entitled to compensation. The respondent also agreed that the case was timely filed, the vaccine was received in the United States, and that petitioner satisfied the statutory severity requirement by suffering residual effects for more than six months post-vaccination. The respondent further noted that petitioner averred no civil action had been pursued regarding the injury. On August 2, 2019, Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation based on the respondent's concession and the evidence of record. Subsequently, on January 6, 2020, the respondent filed a proffer on the award of compensation, proposing a total of $78,465.00. This amount was comprised of $77,500.00 for pain and suffering and $965.00 for unreimbursed expenses. The petitioner agreed with this proposed award. On February 13, 2020, Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a decision awarding Donna McGill a lump sum payment of $78,465.00, payable by check to petitioner, representing compensation for all damages available under the Vaccine Act. Petitioner was noted to be a competent adult, and no guardianship evidence was required. The decision was based on the parties' stipulation and proffer. Theory of causation field: Donna McGill filed a petition alleging a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccine received on October 6, 2017. The respondent conceded that the claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA. The respondent's Rule 4(c) report confirmed timely filing, vaccination in the U.S., and satisfaction of the statutory severity requirement (residual effects for more than six months). Petitioner also averred no civil action was pursued. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement on August 2, 2019, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On January 6, 2020, respondent filed a proffer on award, proposing $78,465.00 ($77,500 for pain and suffering, $965 for unreimbursed expenses), which petitioner accepted. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a decision on February 13, 2020, awarding the stipulated lump sum of $78,465.00. Attorneys for petitioner were Leah VaSahnja Durant and for respondent were Christine Mary Becer. The theory of causation is based on the Vaccine Injury Table (SIRVA). Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01300-0 Date issued/filed: 2019-10-28 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 08/02/2019) regarding 19 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CCaassee 11::1188--vvvv--0011330000--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 1295 FFiilleedd 0180//0228//1199 PPaaggee 11 ooff 22 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1300V Filed: August 2, 2019 UNPUBLISHED DONNA MCGILL, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine HUMAN SERVICES, Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On August 28, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 6, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). CCaassee 11::1188--vvvv--0011330000--UUNNJJ DDooccuummeenntt 1295 FFiilleedd 0180//0228//1199 PPaaggee 22 ooff 22 On July 31, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent has “concluded that petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA.” Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that the case was timely filed, the vaccine was received in the United States, and that petitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement by suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six months after vaccine administration. Id. at 7. Respondent also notes that petitioner avers that no civil action or proceedings have been pursued in connection with the vaccine-related injury. Id. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01300-1 Date issued/filed: 2020-02-13 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 01/07/2020) regarding 31 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:18-vv-01300-UNJ Document 35 Filed 02/13/20 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1300V UNPUBLISHED DONNA MCGILL, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 7, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On August 28, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 6, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On August 2, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On January 6, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $78,465.00 (comprised of $77,500 for pain and suffering and $965.00 for unreimbursed expenses). 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:18-vv-01300-UNJ Document 35 Filed 02/13/20 Page 2 of 4 Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $78,465.00 (comprised of $77,500 for pain and suffering and $965.00 for unreimbursed expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:18-vv-01300-UNJ Document 35 Filed 02/13/20 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) DONNA MCGILL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 18-1300V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On July 31, 2019, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that petitioner suffered an injury that is compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§300aa-10 to -34. Accordingly, on August 2, 2019, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $78,465.00 ($77,500.00 for pain and suffering and $965.00 for unreimbursed expenses) which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. Case 1:18-vv-01300-UNJ Document 35 Filed 02/13/20 Page 4 of 4 II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $78,465.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Christine Mary Becer CHRISTINE MARY BECER Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3665 Date: January 6, 2020 2