A.B. v. HHS - Tdap, neurocardiogenic syncope (2025)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
On August 1, 2018, Jocelyn Banda filed a claim on behalf of her minor child, A.B., alleging that A.B. suffered neurocardiogenic syncope as a result of her August 4, 2015 Tdap vaccination. Respondent filed a report recommending against compensation.
Petitioner submitted expert reports from cardiologist Sammy Zakaria, M.D., who opined that A.B. suffered from dysautonomia following her vaccination, and immunologist David Axelrod, M.D. Respondent submitted responsive expert reports from cardiac electrophysiologist and pharmacist Philip Mar, M.D., Pharm.D., and immunologist Martin Cannon, Ph.D.
Special Master Daniel T. Horner provided preliminary guidance, suggesting that the petitioner was unlikely to prevail and should consider voluntarily dismissing the case, noting similar decisions dismissing claims of vaccine-caused autonomic dysfunction, primarily with regard to the HPV vaccine, and indicating that there did not appear to be better support for the Tdap vaccine as a cause of dysautonomia.
After further expert reports were exchanged, petitioner filed a Motion for a Decision Dismissing her Petition on January 27, 2025, stating that an investigation of the facts and science demonstrated she would be unable to prove entitlement to compensation. Petitioner acknowledged that a dismissal would result in a judgment against her and end all her rights in the Vaccine Program.
To receive compensation, a petitioner must prove either a "Table Injury" or that an injury was actually caused by a covered vaccine, requiring a medical theory connecting the vaccination and injury, a logical sequence of cause and effect, and a proximate temporal relationship. The Special Master granted the petitioner's motion, dismissing the petition for failure to establish a prima facie case of entitlement to compensation.
The case was dismissed on February 27, 2025. Petitioner's counsel was Elaine Whitfield Sharp, and respondent's counsel was Benjamin Rex Eisenberg.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Jocelyn Banda, on behalf of minor A.B., alleged neurocardiogenic syncope resulting from an August 4, 2015 Tdap vaccination. Petitioner's experts, cardiologist Sammy Zakaria, M.D., and immunologist David Axelrod, M.D., opined that A.B. suffered from dysautonomia following the vaccination. Respondent's experts included cardiac electrophysiologist and pharmacist Philip Mar, M.D., Pharm.D., and immunologist Martin Cannon, Ph.D. Special Master Daniel T. Horner, after reviewing initial expert reports, advised petitioner that she was unlikely to prevail, citing precedent dismissing similar claims of vaccine-caused autonomic dysfunction, and noted a lack of support for the Tdap vaccine causing dysautonomia. Petitioner subsequently filed a motion to dismiss, acknowledging an inability to prove entitlement to compensation. The Special Master granted the motion, dismissing the petition for failure to establish a prima facie case. The public decision does not detail the specific medical theory, logical sequence of cause and effect, or proximate temporal relationship presented by the petitioner, nor does it describe the specific symptoms, diagnostic tests, or treatments. The outcome was dismissal, with no award. The decision date was February 27, 2025. Petitioner's counsel was Elaine Whitfield Sharp, and respondent's counsel was Benjamin Rex Eisenberg.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01127