VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01095
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01095
Petitioner: David Choi
Filed: 2018-07-26
Decided: 2020-01-17
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2016-10-05
Condition: left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 62065

AI-assisted case summary:
David Choi filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that he suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) caused by an influenza vaccine he received on October 5, 2016. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, did not contest entitlement to compensation. The respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report stating that they would not contest that Mr. Choi suffered SIRVA, a Table injury, and agreed that he satisfied the legal prerequisites for compensation. Based on the respondent's position and the evidence of record, the Chief Special Master found that Mr. Choi was entitled to compensation. Subsequently, the parties filed a proffer on award of compensation. The respondent proffered that Mr. Choi should be awarded $62,065.00, consisting of $60,000.00 for past and future pain and suffering and $2,065.00 for unreimbursable expenses. Mr. Choi agreed with this proffered award. The decision awarded Mr. Choi a lump sum payment of $62,065.00.

Theory of causation field:
Table

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01095-0
Date issued/filed: 2019-11-08
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 8/16/2019) regarding 23 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law,, Scheduling Order, Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (ypb) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 28 Filed 11/08/19 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1095V
Filed: August 16, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
DAVID CHOI,
Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU);
v. Findings of Fact; Onset; Influenza
(Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Related to Vaccine Administration
HUMAN SERVICES, (SIRVA)
Respondent.
Matthew B. Vianello, Jacobson Press & Fields, Clayton, MO, for petitioner.
Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
FINDINGS OF FACT1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On July 26, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury, which was caused by an
influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 5, 2016. Am. Petition at ¶¶ 1-17.3 The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This
means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the
disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
3 Petitioner’s original petition and affidavit (Ex. 7), refer to the vaccination date as October 9, 2016.
Petitioner filed an amended petition and supplemental affidavit noting that this date was provided in error
having misread the vaccination record. Ex. 8 (Pet’s Supp’l Aff.). The undersigned notes that the date as

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 28 Filed 11/08/19 Page 2 of 4
For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned finds the onset of petitioner’s
shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) occurred within 48 hours of
vaccination. Specifically, petitioner suffered pain within 48 hours of vaccination.
I. Relevant Procedural History
In support of his claim, petitioner filed medical records (Exs. 2, 4-6, 11-13), his
own affidavits (Exs. 7, 8), and witness affidavits (Ex. 3, Aff. of Linh Hoang; Ex. 14, Aff. of
Lan Ho; Ex. 15, Aff. of John Do; Ex. 16, Aff. of Eric Hamblett). Deadlines for respondent
to report his position in the case were set following the September 24, 2018 initial status
conference. Orders, ECF Nos. 8; see also Docket Entries dated Feb. 1, 2019, and Mar.
15, 2019.
On May 15, 2019, respondent filed a status report proposing a Rule 4(c) report
deadline and stating that he was not interested in exploring settlement. ECF No. 19.
Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report on June 19, 2019. Resp.’s Rep., ECF No. 20. In
his report, respondent argued that petitioner had not met his burden of establishing that
the onset of his alleged shoulder injury occurred within 48 hours of his October 5, 2016
flu vaccination. Id. at 3-4.
Thereafter, the undersigned reviewed the evidence and determined that fact
hearing or briefing would not be necessary. Order, ECF No. 21. A deadline was set for
closing the record on the matter of onset. Id. In response, petitioner filed additional
records and witness affidavits. ECF No. 22, Exs. 12-13 (additional pre-vaccination
records), 14-16 (affidavits). The matter is now ripe for adjudication.
II. Issue
At issue is whether petitioner’s first symptom or manifestation of onset after
vaccine administration was within 48 hours as set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table. 42
C.F.R. § 100.3(a) XIV.B. (2017) (influenza vaccination). Additionally, the Qualifications
and aids to interpretation (“QAI”) for a Table SIRVA require that a petitioner’s pain occur
within this same time frame, 48 hours. 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(c)(10).
III. Authority
Pursuant to Vaccine Act § 13(a)(1)(A), a petitioner must prove, by a
preponderance of the evidence, the matters required in the petition by Vaccine Act
written on vaccine recipient line of the vaccination administration record is indeed the number “5” that
could be interpreted alternatively as the number “9.” Ex. 2
2

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 28 Filed 11/08/19 Page 3 of 4
§ 11(c)(1). A special master may find that the first symptom or manifestation of onset of
an injury occurred “within the time period described in the Vaccine Injury Table even
though the occurrence of such symptom or manifestation was not recorded or was
incorrectly recorded as having occurred outside such period.” Vaccine Act § 13(b)(2).
“Such a finding may be made only upon demonstration by a preponderance of the
evidence that the onset [of the injury] . . . did in fact occur within the time period
described in the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id.
A special master must consider, but is not bound by, any diagnosis, conclusion,
judgment, test result, report, or summary concerning the nature, causation, and
aggravation of petitioner’s injury or illness that is contained in a medical record.
Vaccine Act § 13(b)(1). “Medical records, in general, warrant consideration as
trustworthy evidence. The records contain information supplied to or by health
professionals to facilitate diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. With proper
treatment hanging in the balance, accuracy has an extra premium. These records are
also generally contemporaneous to the medical events.” Curcuras v. Sec’y of Health &
Human Servs., 993 F.2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
IV. Finding of Fact
The undersigned makes the finding after a complete review of the record to
include all medical records, affidavits, testimony, expert reports, respondent’s Rule 4
report, and additional evidence filed. Specifically, the undersigned bases the finding on
the following evidence:
• Petitioner received the flu vaccine in his left deltoid on October 5, 2016 at
Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. Ex. 2 at
1.
• On March 13, 2017, petitioner was seen by orthopedist Dr. Craig Ziegler at
Barnes Jewish Hospital for left shoulder pain “starting in October 2016 after
receiving a flu shot to the left shoulder.” Ex. 4 at 10. Petitioner reported “the
pain was sore initially, and worsened over the following 2 days.” Id. An x-ray
and ultrasound were performed and appeared normal. Id. Petitioner received
a corticosteroid injection and was referred to physical therapy (“PT”). Id. at
10-11.
• Petitioner began PT on March 21, 2017 at Excel Sports and Physical
Therapy. Ex. 5 at 8. Petitioner reported that his injury onset was in October
2016, “after the flu shot.” Id. The Physical Therapist, Jhanal Mitra
Chakraborty, noted that petitioner presented “with approx 5 month [history] of
L shoulder pain that started with a flu shot in Oct 2016.” Ex. 5 at 23.
• Petitioner returned to his orthopedist for a follow up on May 9, 2017. Ex. 4 at
4. The record from this appointment notes “[petitioner] was seen previously
for persistent rotator cuff tendonitis following a improperly placed fluid
injection.” Id. Orthopedist, Dr. Ljiljana Bogunovic ordered an MRI and
directed petitioner to return following the results. Id.
3

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 28 Filed 11/08/19 Page 4 of 4
• Petitioner returned to Dr. Bogunovic on June 19, 2017. Ex. 4 at 2. Dr.
Bogunovic reviewed petitioner’s MRI results and administered a
lidocaine/Mercaine/Depo-Medrol injection. Id. Petitioner’s MRI showed no
signs of arthritis or rotator cuff tendon tear. Id. Dr. Bogunovic’s diagnosis
was “subacromial bursitis status post flu shot injection into the subacromial
space.” Id.
• Petitioner recalls that he began experiencing pain in his left shoulder
immediately following his October 5, 2016 flu vaccination. Ex. 8 at 2.
• Lihn Hoang, the sister of petitioner’s girlfriend, recalls that when visiting with
her in October 2016, petitioner mentioned his left shoulder pain which started
after his flu vaccine. Ex. 3. Petitioner asked Ms. Hoang, who is a Nurse
Practitioner, to take a look at his shoulder. Id. Ms. Hoang recalls petitioner
having limited range of motion in his left shoulder for which she
recommended he take over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medication. Id.
• Lan Ho, petitioner’s girlfriend, was with petitioner on the day of his flu
vaccination and recalls his complaints of shoulder pain that evening while at
dinner with their friends. Ex. 14 at 2.
• John Do, petitioner’s roommate, recalls petitioner being unable to participate
in their usual basketball games starting in October 2016 due to his left
shoulder pain. Ex. 15.
• Eric Hamblett, accompanied petitioner to Barnes Jewish Hospital on October
5, 2016 so they could both get a flu shot. Ex. 16. Mr. Hamblett recalls that in
the days following the flu shot petitioner complained of pain and referred to
his left arm as his “dead arm.” Id.
The above medical entries are consistent with petitioner’s affidavit testimony that
his left shoulder pain began at the time he received the flu vaccine on October 5, 2016.
The undersigned finds the sworn testimony of petitioner’s witnesses to be credible and
in agreement with the contemporaneously created treatment records. As such, the
undersigned finds preponderant evidence that the onset of petitioner’s left shoulder
injury occurred within 48 hours of his October 5, 2016 flu vaccination.
V. Scheduling Order
Respondent shall file a status report by Thursday, September 19, 2019,
indicating whether he is interested in exploring an informal resolution of petitioner’s
claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
4

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01095-1
Date issued/filed: 2019-11-27
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 09/26/2019) regarding 25 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 29 Filed 11/27/19 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1095V
Filed: September 26, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
DAVID CHOI,
Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU);
v. Ruling on Entitlement; Uncontested;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
HUMAN SERVICES, Administration (SIRVA)
Respondent.
Matthew B. Vianello, Jacobson Press & Fields, Clayton, MO, for petitioner.
Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On July 26, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury, which was caused by an
influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 5, 2016. Am. Petition at ¶¶ 1-17.3 The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This
means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the
disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
3 Petitioner’s original petition and affidavit (Ex. 7), refer to the vaccination date as October 9, 2016.
Petitioner filed an amended petition and supplemental affidavit noting that this date was provided in error
having misread the vaccination record. Ex. 8 (Pet’s Supp’l Aff.). The undersigned notes that the date as

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 29 Filed 11/27/19 Page 2 of 2
On September 18, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he states
that he does not contest that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.
Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “[b]ased on the
Chief Special Master’s fact ruling, and medical record evidence submitted in this case,
DICP will not continue to contest that petitioner suffered SIRVA as defined by the
Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as
it now stands and subject to his right to appeal the Findings of Fact, respondent does
not dispute that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under
the Act.” Id.
In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
written on vaccine recipient line of the vaccination administration record is indeed the number “5” that
could be interpreted alternatively as the number “9.” Ex. 2
2

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 3: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-01095-2
Date issued/filed: 2020-01-17
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 12/12/2019) regarding 32 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 40 Filed 01/17/20 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1095V
UNPUBLISHED
DAVID CHOI, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: December 12, 2019
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
Injury Related to Vaccine
Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)
Matthew B. Vianello, Jacobsen Press & Fields, Clayton, MO, for petitioner.
Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On July 26, 2018, David Choi filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on
October 5, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
of the Office of Special Masters.
On September 26, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On December 12, 2019, Respondent filed a proffer
on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded
$62,065.00 (consisting of $60,000.00 for past and future pain and suffering, and
$2,065.00 for unreimbursable expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 40 Filed 01/17/20 Page 2 of 4
represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as
a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $62,065.00 (consisting of 60,000.00 for past and future pain and
suffering, and $2,065.00 for past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check
payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 40 Filed 01/17/20 Page 3 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
_________________________________________
DAVID CHOI, )
) ECF-SPU
Petitioner, )
)
v. ) No. 18-1095V
) Chief Special Master
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) Brian H. Corcoran
SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On September 26, 2019, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that David
Choi (“petitioner”) suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a
Table injury, following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered to him on
October 5, 2016. Respondent now Proffers the following regarding the amount of compensation
to be awarded.1
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
a total of $62,065.00, consisting of $60,000.00 for his past and future pain and suffering and
$2,065.00 for past unreimbursable expenses. This represents all elements of compensation to
which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2 Petitioner agrees.
1 The parties have no objection to the proffered award of damages. However, respondent
reserves his right to seek review of the Chief Special Master’s decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa-12(e)(1).
2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future damages.
1

Case 1:18-vv-01095-UNJ Document 40 Filed 01/17/20 Page 4 of 4
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $62,065.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.3
Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH H. HUNT
Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/Lisa A. Watts
LISA A. WATTS
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel.: (202) 616-4099
DATED: December 12, 2019
3 Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.
2