Jacqueline Robinson v. HHS - Prevnar 13, diffuse polyarthritis (2020)

Filed 2018-06-27Decided 2020-06-03Vaccine Prevnar 13
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Jacqueline Robinson filed a petition on June 27, 2018, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. She alleged that she suffered from diffuse polyarthritis following the Prevnar 13 vaccine she received on November 21, 2016.

The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a report contesting entitlement on May 31, 2019. The petitioner requested and received several extensions of time to file an expert report.

However, no expert report was ever filed. On June 2, 2020, the petitioner filed a motion to dismiss, stating that she had determined she would be unable to prove entitlement to compensation and that proceeding further would unnecessarily expend the resources of the Court, the Respondent, and the Vaccine Program.

Special Master Katherine E. Oler noted that to receive compensation under the Vaccine Program, a petitioner must prove either a "Table Injury" or that the vaccine actually caused the injury.

Furthermore, the petition must be supported by medical records or the opinion of a competent medical expert. As there was insufficient evidence in the record for the petitioner to meet her burden of proof, the Special Master dismissed the case for insufficient proof, in accordance with the petitioner's motion.

The Clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly. The decision was issued on June 3, 2020, and is designated as unpublished but will be posted on the Court of Federal Claims' website.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Jacqueline Robinson alleged diffuse polyarthritis following a Prevnar 13 vaccine administered on November 21, 2016. The respondent contested entitlement. Petitioner requested and was granted multiple extensions to file an expert report but never submitted one. Petitioner subsequently moved for dismissal, acknowledging an inability to prove entitlement. Special Master Katherine E. Oler dismissed the case for insufficient proof, citing the requirement for a Table Injury or proof of actual causation, supported by medical records or a competent medical expert's opinion, none of which were present in the record. The public decision does not describe the specific mechanism of injury, expert opinions, or a breakdown of any potential award, as the case was dismissed prior to such considerations. Petitioner was represented by Renée J. Gentry, and Respondent was represented by Mary E. Holmes. The decision date was June 3, 2020.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded