Kathleen Spain v. HHS - DTaP, optic neuritis (2020)

Filed 2018-05-24Decided 2020-03-03Vaccine DTaP
dismissed

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Kathleen Spain filed a petition on May 24, 2018, on her own behalf, alleging that she received a Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccination on May 15, 2017, and subsequently developed optic neuritis. The respondent was the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

The public decision does not describe the petitioner's counsel or the respondent's counsel. On February 7, 2020, Ms.

Spain filed a motion for a decision denying compensation. In this motion, she stated that she had filed all relevant evidence and did not intend to file further evidence.

She waived her right to any hearing or further proceedings and acknowledged that a decision by the Special Master would result in a judgment against her, ending all her rights under the Vaccine Act. She also stated her intention to protect her right to file a civil action.

Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey reviewed the record and Ms. Spain's motion.

The Special Master noted that to receive compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a petitioner must prove either a "Table Injury" or that the injury was actually caused by the vaccination. The Special Master found that the records submitted by Ms.

Spain did not demonstrate entitlement to an award under the Program, as she did not meet the statutory requirements. Consequently, the Special Master dismissed the case and ordered that judgment be entered against Ms.

Spain. The decision was issued on March 3, 2020.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Kathleen Spain alleged that a DTaP vaccination received on May 15, 2017, caused optic neuritis. The case was dismissed on March 3, 2020, by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. Petitioner filed a motion for a decision denying compensation on February 7, 2020, waiving further proceedings and acknowledging that a judgment would end her rights under the Vaccine Act. The public decision does not specify the theory of causation, mention any medical experts, or describe the mechanism of injury. The Special Master found that the petitioner did not meet the statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, leading to dismissal.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded