VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00728 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00728 Petitioner: Barbara Murray Filed: 2019-04-25 Decided: 2020-04-28 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2016-10-14 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 71075 AI-assisted case summary: Barbara Murray filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging that her influenza vaccination on October 14, 2016, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The respondent conceded entitlement to compensation, agreeing that the claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA. Specifically, the respondent noted that Murray had no prior history of shoulder issues, experienced onset of pain within 48 hours of vaccination, and the pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the injection shoulder. The injury also persisted for more than six months, establishing a presumption of vaccine causation. Following the ruling on entitlement, the parties reached a stipulation for damages. On April 28, 2020, the court awarded Barbara Murray a total of $71,075.42. This amount included $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,075.42 for past out-of-pocket medical expenses. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00728-0 Date issued/filed: 2019-08-07 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 04/25/2019) regarding 23 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. )(mpj) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:18-vv-00728-UNJ Document 30 Filed 08/07/19 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-728V Filed: April 25, 2019 UNPUBLISHED BARBARA MURRAY, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine HUMAN SERVICES, Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Amy Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On May 23, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Thereafter, petitioner filed an amended Petition on September 10, 2018. Petitioner’s amended Petition alleges that her influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 14, 2016, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Amended Petition at 1-3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Case 1:18-vv-00728-UNJ Document 30 Filed 08/07/19 Page 2 of 2 On April 24, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 2. Specifically, respondent indicates that [m]edical personnel at the Division of Injury Compensation Programs (“DICP”) have reviewed the petition and medical records filed in this case. Based on that review, DICP has concluded that petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA. Specifically, petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation or dysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to intramuscular vaccine administration that would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings, and/or diagnostic studies occurring after vaccine injection; she suffered the onset of pain within forty eight hours of vaccine administration; her pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the intramuscular vaccine was administered; and there is no other condition or abnormality present that would explain her symptoms. See 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(c)(10). Id. at 3-4. Respondent further agrees that based on the records outlined above, petitioner’s SIRVA and its sequela persisted for more than six months after the administration of the vaccine. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 11(c)(1)(D)(i). Therefore, petitioner is entitled to a presumption of vaccine causation. Id. at 4. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00728-1 Date issued/filed: 2020-04-28 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/26/2020) regarding 47 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:18-vv-00728-UNJ Document 54 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-728V UNPUBLISHED BARBARA MURRAY, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 26, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On May 23, 2018, Barbara Murray, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Thereafter, Petitioner filed an amended Petition on September 10, 2018. Petitioner’s amended Petition alleges that her influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 14, 2016, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Amended Petition at 1-3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On April 25, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On March 24, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $71,075.42. The award is comprised of the following: $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,075.42 for 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:18-vv-00728-UNJ Document 54 Filed 04/28/20 Page 2 of 4 past out of pocket medical expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $71,075.42 (comprised of the following: $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,075.42 for past out of pocket medical expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:18-vv-00728-UNJ Document 54 Filed 04/28/20 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) BARBARA MURRAY, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 18-728V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation On April 24, 2019, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement on April 25, 2019, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her right-sided shoulder injury. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $71,075.42. The award is comprised of the following: $70,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,075.42 for past out of pocket medical expenses. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. Case 1:18-vv-00728-UNJ Document 54 Filed 04/28/20 Page 4 of 4 II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $71,075.42, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ Traci R. Patton TRACI R. PATTON Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Telephone: (202) 353-1589 Dated: March XX, 2020 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. 2