VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00621 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00621 Petitioner: Sally Musulin Filed: 2018-05-01 Decided: 2019-10-24 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2016-12-05 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 73038 AI-assisted case summary: Sally Musulin filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that an influenza vaccine administered on December 5, 2016, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, conceded that Ms. Musulin's claim met the Table criteria for SIRVA. The respondent confirmed that she had no prior shoulder issues, experienced pain and reduced range of motion within 48 hours of the vaccination, and these symptoms were limited to the injected shoulder. Based on the respondent's concession and the evidence, the court found Ms. Musulin entitled to compensation. Subsequently, the parties submitted a proffer agreement for damages. The court awarded Ms. Musulin a total of $73,038.00, comprising $72,500.00 for pain and suffering and $538.00 for unreimbursed expenses, as a lump sum payment. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00621-0 Date issued/filed: 2019-10-22 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 07/22/2019) regarding 31 Ruling on Entitlement Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (ypb) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:18-vv-00621-UNJ Document 40 Filed 10/22/19 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-0621V Filed: July 22, 2019 UNPUBLISHED SALLY MUSULIN, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine HUMAN SERVICES, Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On May 1, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that as the result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on December 5, 2016, she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:18-vv-00621-UNJ Document 40 Filed 10/22/19 Page 2 of 2 On July 22, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation or dysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to intramuscular vaccine administration that would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings, and/or diagnostic studies occurring after vaccine injection; she suffered the onset of pain within forty-eight hours of vaccine administration; her pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the intramuscular vaccine was administered; and there is no other condition or abnormality present that would explain petitioner’s symptoms.” Id. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00621-1 Date issued/filed: 2019-10-24 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 08/23/2019) regarding 35 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:18-vv-00621-UNJ Document 42 Filed 10/24/19 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-0621V Filed: August 23, 2019 UNPUBLISHED SALLY MUSULIN, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Injury Related to Vaccine HUMAN SERVICES, Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On May 1, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury as a result of vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on December 5, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On July 22, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On August 21, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $73,038.00 (comprised 1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:18-vv-00621-UNJ Document 42 Filed 10/24/19 Page 2 of 4 of $72,500.00 for pain and suffering and $538.00 for unreimbursed expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $73,038.00 (comprised of $72,500.00 for pain and suffering and $538.00 for unreimbursed expenses) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Sally Musulin. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:18-vv-00621-UNJ Document 42 Filed 10/24/19 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) SALLY MUSULIN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 18-621V v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On July 22, 2019, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that petitioner suffered an injury that is compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§300aa-10 to -34. Accordingly, on July 22, 2019, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $73,038.00 ($72,500.00 for pain and suffering and $538.00 for unreimbursed expenses) which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. Case 1:18-vv-00621-UNJ Document 42 Filed 10/24/19 Page 4 of 4 II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $73,038.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Christine Mary Becer CHRISTINE MARY BECER Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3665 Date: August 21, 2019 2