Claire Rutz v. HHS - Tdap, biceps tendinitis (2021)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Claire Rutz filed a claim alleging that she suffered left shoulder injuries, later specified as biceps tendinitis, as a result of her Tdap vaccination on November 12, 2016. She initially filed her petition on April 17, 2018, and amended it on March 4, 2019.
The respondent filed a Rule 4 report recommending against compensation. The case proceeded through multiple reassignments and extensions for the petitioner to obtain an expert report.
Despite being granted over a year and multiple extensions, the petitioner was unable to secure an expert opinion, citing difficulties related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The medical records indicated pain and tendinitis in the left elbow, with some physicians noting it was possibly vaccine-related, but no medical opinion sufficiently supported vaccine causation.
The court found that the petitioner did not suffer a SIRVA (Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration) Table injury and failed to meet her burden of proof for an off-Table claim, as she could not establish a medical theory of causation or provide a competent physician's opinion. The court denied the petitioner's request for further extensions and dismissed the petition for failure to prosecute and failure to meet her burden of proof.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00551