Kevin Randall v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (2020)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Kevin Randall filed a petition for vaccine compensation on March 27, 2018, alleging that the influenza vaccine caused him to develop a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The record did not contain sufficient evidence to demonstrate entitlement to an award under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
Petitioner was required to prove either a "Table Injury" listed in the Vaccine Injury Table corresponding to his vaccination or that his injury was actually caused by the vaccine. The record did not contain evidence of a "Table Injury." Furthermore, the record lacked persuasive evidence that petitioner's alleged injury was vaccine-caused or vaccine-related.
Under the Act, petitions cannot be based solely on the petitioner's claims; they must be supported by medical records or the opinion of a competent physician. In this case, the petition lacked supporting medical records, and petitioner offered no medical opinion to support a finding of entitlement.
Maximillian Muller, Esq., represented the petitioner, and Julia Collison, Esq., represented the respondent. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth issued a decision on January 14, 2020, dismissing the case for insufficient proof.
The Clerk was ordered to enter judgment accordingly.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Kevin Randall filed a petition alleging that an influenza vaccine caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The Special Master's decision does not specify the vaccination date or the petitioner's age. To establish entitlement, the petitioner was required to prove either a "Table Injury" or that the vaccine actually caused the injury. The record lacked evidence of a "Table Injury" and persuasive evidence that the injury was vaccine-caused or vaccine-related. The petition was not supported by medical records or a competent physician's opinion, which are required under the Act when claims are not based solely on the petitioner's assertions. Petitioner Maximillian Muller, Esq., and respondent's counsel Julia Collison, Esq., were involved. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth dismissed the case on January 14, 2020, for insufficient proof, and judgment was entered accordingly. No award was made.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00448