VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00445
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00445
Petitioner: D. B.
Filed: 2018-03-26
Decided: 2020-07-27
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2016-08-18
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 40000

AI-assisted case summary:
D. B., an adult, filed a petition for compensation with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on March 26, 2018. She alleged that an influenza vaccine administered on August 18, 2016, caused her to develop a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the flu vaccine caused the petitioner's SIRVA or any other injury. The parties subsequently filed a stipulation recommending an award of compensation. Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey reviewed the stipulation, found it reasonable, and adopted it as the decision of the Court. The stipulation provided for a lump sum payment of $40,000.00, payable to D. B. This amount is intended to compensate for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The parties agreed to expedite the entry of judgment. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical examinations, diagnostic tests, treatments, or the specific mechanism of injury. Petitioner was represented by Ron C. Homer of Conway, Homer, P.C., and respondent was represented by Ryan D. Pyles of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner D. B. alleged that an influenza vaccine administered on August 18, 2016, caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. Petitioner received a lump sum award of $40,000.00. The public decision does not detail the specific theory of causation, medical experts, or the mechanism of injury, other than the general allegation of SIRVA following vaccination. The decision is based on a stipulation, not on a finding of causation after litigation.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00445-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-07-27
Pages: 2
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 7/1/2020) regarding 52 DECISION Stipulation. Signed by Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A)(mca) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:18-vv-00445-UNJ Document 61 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
Filed: July 27, 2020
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
D. B., *
* UNPUBLISHED
Petitioner, *
* No. 18-445V
v. *
* Special Master Dorsey
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Decision Based on Stipulation;
* Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder
Respondent. * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
* (“SIRVA”).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ron C. Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION BASED ON STIPULATION1
On March 26, 2018, D. B. (“petitioner”), filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleged that as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccination
administered on August 18, 2016, she suffered from shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1.
On July 1, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation recommending an award of compensation
to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 51). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine administered on
August 18, 2016 caused petitioner’s SIRVA, or any other injury. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will
be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b),
petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure
of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access.
2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision
to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.
1

Case 1:18-vv-00445-UNJ Document 61 Filed 07/27/20 Page 2 of 2
parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the
stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the
terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation at ¶ 8.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioners’ compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of
Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora B. Dorsey
Nora B. Dorsey
Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2