VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00438 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00438 Petitioner: Louie Garcia Filed: 2018-03-23 Decided: 2022-05-19 Vaccine: Hepatitis B Vaccination date: 2017-06-13 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 68690 AI-assisted case summary: Louie Garcia filed a petition for compensation on March 23, 2018, alleging that the Hepatitis B vaccine he received on June 13, 2017, caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). The Hepatitis B vaccine is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Mr. Garcia alleged that he suffered residual effects from this injury for more than six months. Respondent denied that the vaccine caused his alleged injuries or current disabilities. The parties, represented by Leah V. Durant for the petitioner and Parisa Tabassian for the respondent, reached a joint stipulation for compensation. Special Master Christian J. Moran adopted the stipulation as the decision of the Court. The award included a lump sum payment of $67,500.00 payable to the petitioner. Additionally, $1,190.92 was awarded to reimburse a Medicaid lien for services rendered by the State of California, payable jointly to the petitioner and the California Health and Human Services Agency. This award covers all damages available under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The decision was filed on May 19, 2022. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Louie Garcia alleged that the Hepatitis B vaccine administered on June 13, 2017, caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), an condition listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Petitioner further alleged residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Special Master Christian J. Moran. The stipulation resulted in an award of $67,500.00 for general damages and $1,190.92 for reimbursement of a Medicaid lien. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or the evidence considered in reaching the stipulation. The decision date was May 19, 2022. Petitioner was represented by Leah V. Durant and Respondent by Parisa Tabassian. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_18-vv-00438-0 Date issued/filed: 2022-06-21 Pages: 9 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 5/19/2022) regarding 108 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Special Master Christian J. Moran. (jmw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 9 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LOUIE GARCIA, * * No. 18-438V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: May 19, 2022 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Hepatitis B vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * shoulder injury related to vaccine * administration (“SIRVA”). * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner; Parisa Tabassian, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. UNPUBLISHED DECISION1 On May 19, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Louie Garcia on March 23, 2018. Petitioner alleged that the Hepatitis B vaccine he received on June 13, 2017, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition. 1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 2 of 9 Respondent denies that the vaccine either caused petitioner’s alleged injuries and denies that the vaccine caused any other injury or petitioner’s current disabilities. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Damages awarded in that stipulation include: a. A lump sum payment of $67,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and b. A lump sum payment of $1,190.92, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to petitioner by the State of California, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and the California Health and Human Services Agency, Department of Health Care Services / Third Party Liability and Recovery Division: Department of Health Care Services Recovery Branch – MS 4720 PO Box 997421 Sacramento, CA 95899 [in memo line] Case # C96382831A-VAC03 Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the Department of Health Care Services. These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge. 2 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 3 of 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master 3 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 4 of 9 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 5 of 9 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 6 of 9 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 7 of 9 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 8 of 9 Case 1:18-vv-00438-UNJ Document 112 Filed 06/21/22 Page 9 of 9