Rachelle Gucwa v. HHS - Rotavirus, intussusception (2018)

Filed 2017-12-01Decided 2018-11-05Vaccine Rotavirus
compensated

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

On December 1, 2017, Rachelle Gucwa filed a petition as the parent and natural guardian of her minor son, B.C., alleging that B.C. suffered intussusception after receiving a rotavirus vaccine on July 26, 2016. The respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report on June 13, 2018, conceding entitlement to compensation.

The respondent concluded that B.C. developed intussusception approximately five days after the rotavirus vaccination, that this timing qualified as a Table injury, that no other causes had been identified, and that the injury met the statutory requirements by resulting in inpatient hospitalization and surgical intervention. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement on June 13, 2018, finding B.C. entitled to compensation.

On November 2, 2018, the respondent filed a proffer on the award of compensation. The Chief Special Master issued a decision on November 5, 2018, awarding damages based on this proffer.

The award directed an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract that will provide a certain lump-sum payment of $87,504.36 to B.C. on May 23, 2034, or to his estate if he dies before that date. The public decision does not state the annuity purchase price.

Petitioner was represented by Maximillian J. Muller of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Camille Michelle Collett of the U.S.

Department of Justice. The public decision does not describe the specific onset symptoms, diagnostic tests, or treatments for B.C.'s condition.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Rachelle Gucwa filed on behalf of minor B.C. on December 1, 2017, alleging intussusception resulting from a rotavirus vaccine administered on July 26, 2016. Respondent conceded entitlement in a June 13, 2018 Rule 4(c) report, finding that B.C. suffered intussusception approximately five days post-vaccination, qualifying as a Table injury. Respondent also agreed that no other causes were identified and that the injury met severity requirements through inpatient hospitalization and surgical intervention. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey ruled on entitlement on June 13, 2018. Damages were awarded on November 5, 2018, via a proffer stipulating an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract providing a lump sum of $87,504.36 to B.C. on May 23, 2034, or to his estate. The public decision does not state the annuity purchase price. Petitioner's counsel was Maximillian J. Muller; respondent's counsel was Camille Michelle Collett. The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of injury or name any medical experts.

Source PDFs 3 total · 2 downloaded