Praveen Mathada v. HHS - Tdap, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2019)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
On November 27, 2017, Praveen Mathada filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccination on August 15, 2016. Mr.
Mathada claimed residual effects of the condition lasting more than six months. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the Tdap vaccine caused Mr.
Mathada's SIRVA or any other injury. The parties, represented by Shealene Priscilla Mancuso of Muller Brazil, LLP for the petitioner and Ashley Monique Simpson of the U.S.
Department of Justice for the respondent, filed a joint stipulation on April 30, 2019. In this stipulation, they agreed to an award of compensation.
Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey reviewed and adopted the stipulation as the decision of the Court. The decision awarded Mr.
Mathada a lump sum of $50,000.00, payable by check to the petitioner, as compensation for all items of damages. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses involved in this case.
The decision was originally filed on April 30, 2019, and the full decision document was filed on August 7, 2019.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Praveen Mathada alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following a Tdap vaccination on August 15, 2016, with residual effects lasting over six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation on April 30, 2019, agreeing to compensation. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey adopted the stipulation, awarding a lump sum of $50,000.00 for all damages. The theory of causation is based on the "Table" of the Vaccine Injury Table, which presumes SIRVA is vaccine-related if it meets certain criteria. The public decision does not detail specific medical experts, the mechanism of injury, or the evidence presented beyond the stipulation.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01837