VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01412 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01412 Petitioner: Debra Sepulveda Filed: 2017-09-24 Decided: 2020-06-29 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2015-12-04 Condition: Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 126537 AI-assisted case summary: Debra Sepulveda filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on December 4, 2015. The respondent conceded that her injury was consistent with SIRVA caused by the flu vaccination and that she met all legal prerequisites for compensation. The respondent also confirmed no other cause for the injury was identified and that she suffered residual effects for more than six months. An initial ruling on entitlement was issued on September 24, 2018, finding her entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on May 22, 2020, the parties filed a proffer on award of damages. The court awarded Debra Sepulveda a total of $126,537.56. This amount included $120,000.00 for pain and suffering and $6,537.56 for unreimbursable expenses. The award was made as a lump sum payment. Theory of causation field: Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01412-0 Date issued/filed: 2018-10-24 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 09/24/2018) regarding 28 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. )(mpj) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 32 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1412V Filed: September 24, 2018 UNPUBLISHED DEBRA SEPULVEDA, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Administration (SIRVA) HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On October 3, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of her December 4, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1, 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On September 17, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has determined that petitioner’s alleged 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 32 Filed 10/24/18 Page 2 of 2 injury is consistent with SIRVA that was caused by the administration of petitioner’s flu vaccination.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that no other cause for petitioner’s injury was identified, that petitioner suffered residual effects of her condition for more than six months, and that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01412-1 Date issued/filed: 2020-06-29 Pages: 5 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 05/22/2020) regarding 70 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 74 Filed 06/29/20 Page 1 of 5 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1412V UNPUBLISHED DEBRA SEPULVEDA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 22, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On October 3, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of her December 4, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1, 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On September 24, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On May 22, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 74 Filed 06/29/20 Page 2 of 5 $126,537.56, representing $120,000.00 for her actual and projected3 pain and suffering and $6,537.56 for her actual unreimburseable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $126,537.56, representing $120,000.00 for her actual and future pain and suffering and $6,537.56 for her actual unreimburseable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 The Proffer indicates that any amounts for projected pain and suffering have been reduced to net present value. Proffer at 1 (citing § 15 (a)(4)). 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 74 Filed 06/29/20 Page 3 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS DEBRA SEPULVEDA, Petitioner, No. 17-1412V v. Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. PROFFER ON AWARD OF DAMAGES On October 3, 2017, Debra Sepulveda (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to - 34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. The Petition alleges that petitioner received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine in her left shoulder on December 4, 2015, and that she subsequently suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1, 4. Respondent concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury satisfies the criteria of the Vaccine Injury Table, and therefore conceded petitioner’s entitlement to compensation in his Rule 4(c) Report filed on September 17, 2018. Based on Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report the Court found petitioner entitled to compensation. I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $120,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. 1 Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 74 Filed 06/29/20 Page 4 of 5 B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $6,537.56. Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $126,537.56, in the form of a check made payable to petitioner.1 This lump sum payment represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. 2 Case 1:17-vv-01412-UNJ Document 74 Filed 06/29/20 Page 5 of 5 s/Jennifer L. Reynaud JENNIFER L. REYNAUD Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-1586 Date: May 22, 2020 3