Nickol Marta v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2019)

Filed 2017-09-27Decided 2019-04-17Vaccine Influenza
compensated$80,000

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

On September 27, 2017, Nickol Marta filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. She alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving an influenza vaccine on September 22, 2015.

Ms. Marta claimed that she experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months and that no prior civil action for damages had been filed.

The respondent denied that the influenza immunization caused Ms. Marta's alleged SIRVA or any other injury.

On February 22, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing that compensation should be awarded. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation to be reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the court.

Pursuant to the stipulation, Ms. Marta was awarded a lump sum of $80,000.00, payable by check to the petitioner, as compensation for all items of damages.

The decision was issued on April 17, 2019. Petitioner was represented by Leah VaSahnja Durant of the Law Offices of Leah V.

Durant, PLLC, and respondent was represented by Ryan Daniel Pyles of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Nickol Marta alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination on September 22, 2015. The respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation on February 22, 2019, agreeing to an award of compensation. The Special Master adopted the stipulation. The public decision does not describe the specific theory of causation, medical experts, onset, symptoms, diagnostic tests, or treatments. The award was $80,000.00 as a lump sum. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued the decision on April 17, 2019. Petitioner's counsel was Leah VaSahnja Durant, and respondent's counsel was Ryan Daniel Pyles. The case falls under the Vaccine Act's "Table" category for SIRVA.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded