VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01236
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01236
Petitioner: Elenita Alvarez-Tompkins
Filed: 2017-09-12
Decided: 2019-05-29
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2016-11-09
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 30000

AI-assisted case summary:
Elenita Alvarez-Tompkins, an adult, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on September 12, 2017. She alleged that an influenza vaccine administered to her left shoulder on November 9, 2016, caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) with residual effects lasting more than six months. The respondent denied that the flu vaccination caused the alleged SIRVA or any other injury. The parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation agreeing that compensation should be awarded. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Ms. Alvarez-Tompkins was awarded a lump sum of $30,000.00, payable to her, representing compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act, specifically for pain and suffering and other damages related to her SIRVA. Petitioner was represented by Leah VaSahnja Durant of the Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, and respondent was represented by Claudia Barnes Gangi of the U.S. Department of Justice. The decision was issued on May 29, 2019.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Elenita Alvarez-Tompkins alleged that an influenza vaccine received on November 9, 2016, caused a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) with residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to an award of compensation. The public decision does not describe the specific theory of causation, medical experts, clinical details of the injury, onset, symptoms, diagnostic tests, or treatments. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey adopted the stipulation, awarding a lump sum of $30,000.00 for all damages available under the Vaccine Act, including pain and suffering and other damages related to the SIRVA. The decision was issued on May 29, 2019. Petitioner was represented by Leah VaSahnja Durant and respondent by Claudia Barnes Gangi.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-01236-0
Date issued/filed: 2019-05-29
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/21/2019) regarding 40 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. )(mpj) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-1236V
Filed: March 21, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
ELENITA ALVAREZ-TOMPKINS,
Petitioner,
Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
v.
Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
(Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
SECRETARY OF HEALTH
Related to Vaccine Administration
AND HUMAN SERVICES,
(SIRVA)
Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On September 12, 2017, Ms. Alvarez-Tompkins (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder
injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”)
vaccine she received to her left shoulder on November 9, 2016. Petition at 1;
Stipulation, filed March 21, 2019, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the
residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petition at 3; Stipulation at ¶ 4.
“Respondent denies that the flu vaccination caused petitioner’s alleged SIRVA or any
other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 2 of 7
Nevertheless, on March 21, 2019, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
awards the following compensation:
A lump sum of $30,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-01236-UNJ Document 44 Filed 05/29/19 Page 7 of 7