Margaret Rogers v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2019)

Filed 2017-07-27Decided 2019-04-24Vaccine Influenza
compensated$75,614

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Margaret Rogers filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on July 27, 2017, alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccine received on October 6, 2015. She further alleged that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

The respondent denied that the flu vaccine administered on or about October 6, 2015, was the cause of petitioner's alleged SIRVA or any other injury or her current condition. Despite the respondent's denial, the parties filed a joint stipulation on March 5, 2019, agreeing that compensation should be awarded.

Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Margaret Rogers was awarded a lump sum of $75,614.76, payable to petitioner, as compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act.

The clerk was directed to enter judgment accordingly. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests performed, treatments received, or the names of any medical experts consulted by either party.

Petitioner was represented by Amy A. Senerth of Muller Brazil, LLP, and respondent was represented by Linda Sara Renzi of the U.S.

Department of Justice.

Theory of causation

Margaret Rogers filed a petition alleging a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccine received on October 6, 2015, with residual effects lasting more than six months. The respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. The award was a lump sum of $75,614.76. The public decision does not specify the mechanism of injury, the specific Table category, or provide details on medical experts or evidence presented, relying instead on the joint stipulation for resolution. Petitioner was represented by Amy A. Senerth, and respondent by Linda Sara Renzi. The decision was issued on April 24, 2019.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded