Andres Spinetti v. HHS - Meningococcal, autoimmune neuroretinitis and / or optic neuritis (2019)

Filed 2017-07-14Decided 2019-01-22Vaccine Meningococcal
compensated$80,640

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Andres Spinetti, substituted as petitioner upon reaching the age of majority, filed a petition for compensation on July 14, 2017, alleging that a meningococcal vaccine administered on or about April 9, 2015, caused him to suffer autoimmune neuroretinitis and/or optic neuritis, with residual effects lasting more than six months. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the vaccine caused or aggravated the petitioner's condition.

The parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation agreeing to compensation. Special Master Christian J.

Moran reviewed and adopted the stipulation. The decision awarded Andres Spinetti a total of $80,640.57.

This amount comprised a lump sum of $75,000.00 for general damages, payable to the petitioner, and a lump sum of $5,640.57 for past unreimbursed expenses, payable to the petitioner and his parents, Livania Zavala and Nelson J. Spinetti.

The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, clinical details of the condition, diagnostic tests performed, or treatments received. The attorneys involved were Ramon Rodriguez III for the petitioner and Lara A.

Englund for the respondent. The case was compensated based on the stipulation.

Theory of causation

Petitioner Andres Spinetti alleged that a meningococcal vaccine received on or about April 9, 2015, caused autoimmune neuroretinitis and/or optic neuritis, with residual effects lasting more than six months. The condition is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Special Master Christian J. Moran on December 18, 2018. The award was $80,640.57 ($75,000.00 for general damages and $5,640.57 for past unreimbursed expenses). The public decision does not detail the specific mechanism of causation, expert testimony, or clinical evidence presented, as the case was resolved via stipulation. Petitioner counsel was Ramon Rodriguez III; respondent counsel was Lara A. Englund.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded