Heidi Theis v. HHS - Influenza, left shoulder injury, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS) (2021)

Filed 2017-06-19Decided 2021-07-20Vaccine Influenza
compensated$203,005

Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]

Heidi Theis filed a petition on June 19, 2017, alleging that the influenza vaccine she received on October 24, 2014, caused a left shoulder injury, later diagnosed as chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Ms.

Theis further alleged that the residual effects of this injury lasted for more than six months and that there had been no prior award or settlement for damages related to her condition. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the flu vaccine caused Ms.

Theis's left shoulder injury, CRPS, or any other injury. Despite the respondent's denial, the parties reached a joint stipulation for compensation.

Special Master Christian J. Moran reviewed the stipulation and found it reasonable, adopting it as the decision of the Court.

The stipulation awarded Ms. Theis a lump sum payment of $203,005.20, payable by check to the petitioner.

This amount was intended to compensate for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). The decision was filed on July 20, 2021.

Amber D. Wilson represented the petitioner, and Lynn C.

Schlie represented the respondent. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical tests, treatments, or expert witnesses involved in this case.

Theory of causation

Heidi Theis received an influenza vaccine on October 24, 2014, and subsequently developed a left shoulder injury diagnosed as chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), with residual effects lasting over six months. The injury is listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. The respondent denied causation. The parties reached a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Special Master Christian J. Moran on July 20, 2021. The stipulation awarded a lump sum of $203,005.20 to the petitioner, Heidi Theis, represented by Amber D. Wilson. The respondent was represented by Lynn C. Schlie. The specific mechanism of injury, expert testimony, or detailed medical evidence supporting the causation theory are not described in the provided public decision text, which indicates the case was resolved via stipulation.

Source PDFs 2 total · 1 downloaded