VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00814 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00814 Petitioner: Lynette Pestel Filed: 2017-06-16 Decided: 2018-03-19 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2014-09-26 Condition: Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Lynette Pestel filed a petition on June 16, 2017, alleging that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) as a result of an influenza vaccine received on September 26, 2014. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) Report on February 15, 2018, concluding that compensation was appropriate under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The respondent stated that Ms. Pestel satisfied the criteria for GBS following a flu vaccination as set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table. Based on the respondent's position and the evidence of record, Special Master Herbrina Sanders found that Ms. Pestel is entitled to compensation for her GBS and its related sequelae. The parties were ordered to file a status report on settlement discussions by March 23, 2018. The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, or expert witnesses. Petitioner was represented by Shealene Wasserman of Muller Brazil, LLP, and Respondent was represented by Debra A. Begley of the United States Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Lynette Pestel alleged GBS following an influenza vaccine administered on September 26, 2014. Respondent conceded entitlement, stating Petitioner met the criteria for GBS as set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table. The Special Master found Petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS and its sequelae. The public decision does not name experts or detail the specific mechanism of injury, but relies on the Vaccine Injury Table. The outcome was compensated. Special Master Herbrina Sanders issued the ruling on entitlement on March 19, 2018. Petitioner counsel was Shealene Wasserman, and Respondent counsel was Debra A. Begley. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00814-0 Date issued/filed: 2018-03-19 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC RULING (Originally filed: 02/21/2018) regarding 17 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Special Master Herbrina Sanders. (kl) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00814-UNJ Document 18 Filed 03/19/18 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: February 21, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LYNETTE PESTEL, * * Petitioner, * * No. 17-814V v. * Special Master Sanders * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Ruling on Entitlement; Uncontested; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Table Injury; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Shealene Wasserman, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Debra A. Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On June 16, 2017, Lynette Pestel (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.2 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza vaccine she received on September 26, 2014. Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1. On February 15, 2018, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report. ECF No. 16. In his report, Respondent concludes that “compensation is appropriate under the Act.” Id. at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “[P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the newly revised Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for GBS following a flu vaccination.” Id. at 4. Accordingly, Respondent concludes that Petitioner is entitled to an award of damages “limited to [P]etitioner’s GBS and its related sequelae only.” Id. 1 This decision shall be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, such material will be deleted from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 1 Case 1:17-vv-00814-UNJ Document 18 Filed 03/19/18 Page 2 of 2 In light of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to compensation. In a status report filed on February 1, 2018, Petitioner stated that she sent a demand to Respondent on that date. ECF No. 14. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report on the progress of settlement discussions no later than Friday, March 23, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herbrina D. Sanders Herbrina D. Sanders Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00814-1 Date issued/filed: 2018-08-24 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/16/2018) regarding 24 DECISION - Proffer. Signed by Special Master Herbrina Sanders. (kel) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00814-UNJ Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 16, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LYNETTE PESTEL, * * No. 17-814V Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders * v. * Decision on Proffer; Damages; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Shealene Wasserman, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner. Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. . DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 16, 2017, Lynette Pestel (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.2 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza vaccine she received on September 26, 2014. Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1. On February 15, 2018, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report, in which he concluded that “[P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the newly revised Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for GBS following a flu vaccination.” ECF No. 16. Accordingly, Respondent concluded that Petitioner is entitled to an award of damages “limited to [P]etitioner’s GBS and its related sequelae only.” Id. On February 21, 2018, the undersigned issued a Ruling on Entitlement consistent with Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report. ECF No. 17. 1 This decision shall be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, such material will be deleted from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 1 Case 1:17-vv-00814-UNJ Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 2 of 4 On July 16, 2018, Respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”). ECF No. 23. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, attached as Appendix A, the undersigned awards Petitioner a lump sum payment of $122,876.92, representing compensation for past and future pain and suffering ($120,000.00), past unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses ($2,000.00), and past unreimbursed wage loss ($876.92), in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herbrina D. Sanders Herbrina D. Sanders Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:17-vv-00814-UNJ Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ************************************* LYNETTE PESTEL, * * Petitioner, * No. 17-814V * SPECIAL MASTER SANDERS v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************************************* RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation The Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement on February 21, 2018. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded the following amounts: A. $120,000.00, which represents compensation for past and future pain and suffering; B. $2,000.00, which represents compensation for past unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses; and C. $876.92, which represents compensation for past unreimbursed wage loss. These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. Case 1:17-vv-00814-UNJ Document 26 Filed 08/24/18 Page 4 of 4 II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that petitioner be awarded a lump sum payment of $122,876.92 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY DEBRA A. FILTEAU BEGLEY Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Phone: (202) 616-4181 Dated: July 16, 2018 2