VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00666 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00666 Petitioner: Robert Meli Filed: 2017-05-22 Decided: 2018-12-27 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2016-10-13 Condition: Guillain-Barre Syndrome Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 150000 AI-assisted case summary: Robert Meli, a 70-year-old adult, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on May 22, 2017, alleging that he developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 13, 2016. Mr. Meli reported experiencing back pain approximately one week after the vaccination, which progressed to numbness, tingling, and weakness in his limbs, accompanied by a left facial droop. A neurologist diagnosed him with GBS and Bell's palsy, and he was treated with a five-day course of IVIG. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, reviewed the medical records and agreed that Mr. Meli's GBS was a "Table injury" following the influenza vaccine, with no other identified causes and symptoms lasting more than six months. The case proceeded as a Table claim. On November 26, 2018, the respondent filed a report agreeing that the claim was appropriate for compensation, stating that Mr. Meli had met the statutory requirements for compensation under the Act. A Ruling on Entitlement was issued by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth, finding Mr. Meli entitled to compensation. Subsequently, on November 26, 2018, the respondent filed a proffer on damages. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth adopted the proffer and issued a decision on damages on December 27, 2018, awarding Mr. Meli a lump sum of $150,000.00, payable by check to Mr. Meli, representing compensation for all damages available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner was represented by Phyllis Widman, Esq., of Widman Law Firm, LLC, and respondent was represented by Daniel Principato, Esq., of the U.S. Department of Justice. Theory of causation field: Petitioner Robert Meli, age 70, received an influenza vaccine on October 13, 2016. He subsequently developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), with onset of symptoms including back pain, numbness, tingling, weakness in limbs, and left facial droop, approximately one week after vaccination. A neurologist diagnosed GBS and Bell's palsy. The respondent, Secretary of Health and Human Services, reviewed the medical records and agreed that the GBS was a "Table injury" following the influenza vaccine, with no other identified causes and symptoms lasting more than six months. The respondent's report stated that petitioner met the statutory requirements for compensation, including suffering the condition for more than six months. The case proceeded as a Table claim. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. Subsequently, Special Master Roth issued a Decision on Damages on December 27, 2018, adopting the respondent's proffer and awarding a lump sum of $150,000.00 to petitioner, representing all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner was represented by Phyllis Widman, Esq., and respondent by Daniel Principato, Esq. Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00666-0 Date issued/filed: 2018-12-21 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 11/26/2018) regarding 27 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth. (mw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-666V Filed: November 26, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ROBERT MELI, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * * v. * Ruling on Entitlement; Table Injury; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Phyllis Widman, Esq., Widman Law Firm, LLC, Ocean City, NJ, for petitioner. Daniel Principato, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Roth, Special Master: On May 22, 2017, Robert Meli (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”)2 alleging that he received an influenza vaccination on October 13, 2016, and thereafter suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”). See Petition at 1. On November 26, 2018, respondent filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) stating that petitioner’s claim was appropriate for compensation. Resp. Rpt. at 1. Specifically, respondent 1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa- 10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 34 Filed 12/21/18 Page 2 of 2 agrees with petitioner’s claim that he suffered the Table injury of GBS following influenza vaccine. Id. at 3. Respondent further states that there is not preponderant evidence that petitioner’s GBS was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccination. Id. Based on a review of the medical records, respondent states that petitioner has met the applicable statutory requirements by suffering his condition for more than six months and that, therefore, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. A special master may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation based upon the record. A hearing is not required. §300aa-13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). In light of respondent’s concession and a review of the record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00666-1 Date issued/filed: 2018-12-27 Pages: 6 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/27/2018) regarding 28 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth. (mw) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 35 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 6 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-666V Filed: November 27, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * ROBERT MELI, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision on Damages; * Proffer; Influenza (“Flu”) v. * Vaccine; Guillain-Barre * Syndrome (“GBS”). SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Phyllis Widman, Esq., Widman Law Firm, LLC, Ocean City, NJ for petitioner. Daniel Principato, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON DAMAGES1 Roth, Special Master: On May 22, 2017, Robert Meli [“Mr. Meli” or “petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petitioner alleges that he developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 13, 2016. See Petition, ECF No. 1. Respondent thereafter filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) electing not to contest entitlement to compensation. Respondent’s Report at 1, ECF No. 26. 1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 35 Filed 12/27/18 Page 2 of 6 A Ruling on Entitlement was issued. ECF No. 27. Respondent filed a proffer on November 26, 2018, agreeing to issue the following payment: A lump sum of $150,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Robert Meli. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). I adopt respondent’s proffer attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 35 Filed 12/27/18 Page 3 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) ROBERT MELI, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 17-666V ) Special Master Roth v. ) ECF ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S REPORT AND PROFFER On May 22, 2017, Robert Meli (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 13, 2016. See generally Petition. In accordance with the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, Appendix B, Vaccine Rule 4(c), the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”), submits the following as his responsive report. The facts of this case, as reflected in the Petition and accompanying documents, were reviewed by medical personnel of the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services (“DICP”). Respondent’s opinion is that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act. FACTS Petitioner was 70 years old when he received the flu vaccine on October 13, 2016, at the office of his primary care provider (“PCP”). Exhibit (“Ex.”) 1 at 1. 1 Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 35 Filed 12/27/18 Page 4 of 6 On November 1, 2016, petitioner presented to the emergency room, complaining of a one-week history of back pain. Ex. 4 at 22. He described the pain as being intermittent and radiating into his arms and legs. Id. A neurologic exam was normal, and petitioner was assessed with thoracic back pain. Id. at 23-24. Petitioner presented to a neurologist on November 9, 2016, reporting that about a week after his flu shot, he “developed interscapular pain with numbness and tingling of both hands and feet that is constant” and “was followed by weakness of his legs.” Ex. 3 at 1. He “present[ed] with persistent numbness and tingling of his limbs, weakness, and left facial droop.” Id. An exam revealed “weakness of the small hand muscles and questionable weakness of the hip flexors of the hamstrings” and impaired sensation. Id. at 2. Petitioner was also “areflexic to both upper and lower extremities.” Id. Petitioner was diagnosed with GBS and admitted to the hospital for a five-day course of IVIG. Id. Petitioner was discharged on November 14, 2016, with diagnoses of, inter alia, GBS and Bell’s palsy. Ex. 5 at 47. On December 5, 2016, petitioner followed with neurology, reporting that he was “90% better.” Ex. 3 at 3. Petitioner’s “left facial paralysis” was also improved. Id. Petitioner further reported “only slight tingling of his fingertips and toes but his weakness of his hands and going up steps has improved significantly,” and “denie[d] any new neurologic complaints.” Id. The impression was that petitioner was “recovering nicely from [GBS].” Id. at 4. Petitioner’s PCP wrote a letter dated May 4, 2017, stating that petitioner had “been making progress in his recovery” and that his “optimal recovery may be a year or more from onset but his prognosis at this point is good.” Ex. 6 at 1. Petitioner’s PCP wrote a second letter on November 9, 2017, stating that he had seen petitioner on September 13, 2017, and the impression from that visit included GBS “secondary to influenza vaccination.” Ex. 7 at 1. 2 Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 35 Filed 12/27/18 Page 5 of 6 DISCUSSION DICP has reviewed the Petition, medical records, and affidavit filed in this case, and has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury meets the requirements of the Vaccine Injury Table for GBS following the seasonal flu vaccination. See 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a)(XIV), (b)(15), as amended. That is, petitioner had the onset of GBS within 3 to 42 days of receiving the flu vaccine, the diagnosis is not in dispute, and no other causes for his GBS have been identified. Id.; 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1)(B). Further, petitioner’s records show that he suffered the sequela of his injury for more than six months after vaccination. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 11(c)(1)(D). Therefore, based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. * * * PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $150,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $150,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 1 Should Petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 3 Case 1:17-vv-00666-UNJ Document 35 Filed 12/27/18 Page 6 of 6 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C.SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Daniel A. Principato DANIEL A. PRINCIPATO Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Phone: (202) 616-3662 Fax: (202) 353-2988 Dated: November 26, 2018 4