VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00263 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00263 Petitioner: Michele Carusotto Filed: 2017-10-10 Decided: 2018-03-01 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2015-10-07 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 120000 AI-assisted case summary: Michele Carusotto filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccine she received on October 7, 2015. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding that Ms. Carusotto is entitled to compensation for a SIRVA of her left upper extremity within 48 hours of the vaccine. The respondent agreed that she had satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation. Subsequently, on November 8, 2017, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, recommending an award of $120,000.00, which Ms. Carusotto agreed to. The Chief Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement on October 10, 2017, finding Ms. Carusotto entitled to compensation. A decision awarding damages was issued on March 1, 2018, granting a lump sum payment of $120,000.00 to Ms. Carusotto, representing compensation for all damages available under the Act. The case proceeded as an off-Table claim, with the respondent conceding entitlement based on the evidence of record. Theory of causation field: Off-Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00263-0 Date issued/filed: 2018-02-13 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 10/10/2017) regarding 22 Ruling on Entitlement. Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (rp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00263-UNJ Document 30 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-263V Filed: October 10, 2017 UNPUBLISHED MICHELE CARUSOTTO, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Ilene Clair Albala, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On February 23, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from the influenza vaccine she received on October 7, 2015. Petition at 1, ¶ 2. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccine in the United States, suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and has not filed a lawsuit or received a settlement or award for her injury. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:17-vv-00263-UNJ Document 30 Filed 02/13/18 Page 2 of 2 On October 5, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “opines that petitioner experienced a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) of the left upper extremity within 48 hours of flu vaccine administration.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00263-1 Date issued/filed: 2018-03-01 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/8/2017) regarding 26 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (rp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00263-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0263V Filed: November 8, 2017 UNPUBLISHED MICHELE CARUSOTTO, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Petitioner, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder v. Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Ilene Clair Albala, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On February 23, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from the influenza vaccine she received on October 7, 2015. Petition at 1, ¶ 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On October 10, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for her shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). On November 8, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $120,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:17-vv-00263-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/01/18 Page 2 of 4 on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $120,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Michele Carusotto. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:17-vv-00263-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/01/18 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) MICHELE CARUSOTTO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 17-263 v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Items of Compensation On October 10, 2017, Chief Special Master Dorsey issued an Order finding that petitioner’s case was entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA). Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $120,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $120,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Case 1:17-vv-00263-UNJ Document 31 Filed 03/01/18 Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ Ilene Albala ILENE ALBALA Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Direct dial: (202) 616-3655 Dated: November 8, 2017 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. 2