Emory Newsome v. HHS - Influenza, shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) (2018)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Emory Newsome filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on February 21, 2017, alleging that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccination received on December 10, 2015. The petition stated that the vaccination was administered in the United States, that his symptoms had continued for more than six months, and that he had not previously received compensation or filed a civil action.
The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer a SIRVA or any other injury. Despite the denial, on April 13, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing that compensation should be awarded.
Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Pursuant to the stipulation, Emory Newsome was awarded a lump sum of $60,000.00, payable to the petitioner, as compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act.
The decision was issued on August 21, 2018. Petitioner's counsel was John Robert Howie of Howie Law, PC.
Respondent's counsel was Sarah Christina Duncan of the U.S. Department of Justice.
The public decision does not describe the specific onset of symptoms, medical examinations, diagnostic tests, or treatments received by the petitioner. The specific mechanism of injury is also not detailed in the public decision.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Emory Newsome alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) following an influenza vaccination on December 10, 2015. The respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation for compensation, which was adopted by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. The stipulation resulted in a $60,000.00 lump sum award. The theory of causation is based on the "Table" of the Vaccine Injury Table, which presumes SIRVA is vaccine-related if it occurred within 48 hours of administration and persisted for more than 6 months. The public decision does not name specific medical experts or detail the evidence presented, other than the joint stipulation. The specific mechanism of SIRVA is not described in the public decision. Attorneys involved were John Robert Howie for the petitioner and Sarah Christina Duncan for the respondent. The decision date was August 21, 2018.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00247