VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00147
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00147
Petitioner: J.B.
Filed: 2017-01-31
Decided: 2021-08-05
Vaccine: DTaP
Vaccination date: 2015-07-27
Condition: morphea
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 175862

AI-assisted case summary:
On January 31, 2017, M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their minor child J.B., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. They alleged that J.B. suffered morphea as a result of receiving Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP) and Polio Inactivated Virus (IPV) vaccines on July 27, 2015. The petition also included claims for pneumococcal, rotovirus, and HIB immunizations administered on the same date. The respondent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denied that the vaccines caused J.B.'s condition. The parties filed a joint stipulation on December 19, 2019, agreeing to settle the case and award compensation. On December 20, 2019, Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued a decision on the joint stipulation. The award included a lump sum of $119,050.00 for first-year life care expenses and pain and suffering, a lump sum of $50,000.00 for past unreimbursable expenses, and an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract for future expenses. Judgment was entered on December 23, 2019. Subsequently, on March 8, 2021, the parties filed a joint motion for relief from judgment and entry of modified judgment. They explained that delays in establishing guardianship for J.B. in Texas due to the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the original annuity payment schedule, which was to begin on the first anniversary of the judgment, could not be met because annuity companies cannot make payments in arrears. The parties requested that a portion of the annuity intended for future life care expenses be paid as a lump sum to account for the delay. Specifically, they proposed that $6,812.00 for the second year of life care expenses be included in the initial cash award, bringing the total for life care expenses to $13,362.00. This modification would allow annuity payments to begin on the second anniversary of the judgment. On August 5, 2021, Chief Special Master Corcoran granted the motion for relief from judgment under RCFC 60(b)(6), finding that the circumstances justified the amendment. The judgment was modified to reflect a total initial cash award of $125,862.00 for life care expenses and pain and suffering, plus the $50,000.00 for past unreimbursable expenses, and the annuity contract, with payments to begin on the second anniversary of the original judgment. The total award, including the annuity, was $175,862.00 in initial cash awards plus the annuity.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioners alleged that J.B. suffered morphea as a result of receiving DTaP and IPV vaccines on July 27, 2015. The theory of causation is based on the Vaccine Injury Table. The parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle the case, and the Special Master adopted the stipulation as the decision. The initial decision on December 20, 2019, awarded compensation including a lump sum for pain and suffering and life care expenses, past unreimbursable expenses, and an annuity for future expenses. A subsequent decision on August 5, 2021, granted a motion for relief from judgment to modify the award due to pandemic-related delays in establishing guardianship, altering the payment structure of the award. The total initial cash award was $175,862.00 plus the annuity. Attorneys for petitioners were Andrew Donald Downing and Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC. Attorneys for respondent were Linda Sara Renzi and Heather Lynn Pearlman. Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran issued both decisions.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00147-0
Date issued/filed: 2020-04-09
Pages: 10
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 12/20/2019) regarding 64 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 1 of 10
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-0147V
UNPUBLISHED
M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their Minor Chief Special Master Corcoran
Child, J.B.,
Filed: December 20, 2019
Petitioners,
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Diphtheria
HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP)
Vaccine; Polio Inactivated Virus (IPV)
Respondent. Vaccine; Morphea
Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioners.
Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
On January 31, 2017, M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their Minor Child, J.B., filed a
petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42
U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners allege that J.B. suffered
morphea as a result of receiving the Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (“DTaP”)
and Polio Inactivated Virus (“IPV”) vaccines on July 27, 2015. Petition at 1-2;
Stipulation, filed December 19, 2019, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioners further allege that the
vaccines were administered in the United States and that there has been no prior award
or settlement of a civil action for damages on behalf of J.B. as a result of her condition.
Petition at 1-5; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the vaccines caused J.B.
to suffer from morphea or any other injury or her current condition. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 2 of 10
Nevertheless, on December 19, 2019, the parties filed the attached joint
stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the
stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set
forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following
compensation:
1. A lump sum of $119,050.00, which amount represents compensation
for first year life care expenses ($6,550.00), pain and suffering
($112,500.00), in the form of a check payable to Petitioners as
guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of J.B. for the benefit of J.B.
No payments shall be made until Petitioners provide Respondent
with documentation establishing that they have been appointed as
guardian(s)/conservator(s) of J.B.’s estate;
2. A lump sum of $50,000.00, which amount represents compensation
for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to
Petitioners, M.B. and J.B.; and
3. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in
paragraph 10 of the Stipulation, paid to the life insurance company
from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance
Company”).
Stipulation at ¶ 8.
These amounts represent compensation for all items of damages that would be
available under § 15(a). Id.
I approve the requested amount for Petitioners’ compensation. In the absence of
a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed
to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 3 of 10
IN THE UNITED STA TES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
and~
on behalf of their minor child, J.B.,
Petitioners, No. 17-147V
Chief Special Master
v. Brian H. Corcoran
ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
STIPULATION
The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:
I. On behalf of their daughter, J.B., petitioners filed a petition for vaccine compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10 to 34 (the
"Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to J.B.'s
receipt of the DTaP and IPV vaccines, which vaccines are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table
(the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).
2. J.B. received DTaP, IPV, pneumococcal, rotovirus, and HIB immunizations on July
27, 2015.
3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.
4. Petitioners allege that J.B. suffered from morphea as a result of receiving the DTaP
and/or IPV vaccines.
5. Petitioners represent that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action
for damages on behalf of J.B. as a result of her condition.

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 4 of 10
6. Respondent denies that the vaccines caused J.B. to suffer from morphea or any other
injury or her current condition.
7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the
issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the
compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.
8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with
the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioners have filed an election to receive compensation
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 I (a)(l ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue
the following vaccine compensation payments:
a. A lump sum of $119,050.00, which amount represents compensation for first year life
care expenses ($6,550.00), pain and suffering ($112,500.00), in the form of a check
payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of J.B. for the benefit of
J.B. No payments shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation
establishing that they have been appointed as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of J.B. 's estate;
past
b. A lump sum of$50,000.00, which amount represents compensation f~
unreimbursable expenses, in the fom1 of a check payable to petitioners, ~
and- ~and
c. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph l 0
below, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the
"Life Insurance Company").
These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
U.S.C. §300aa-l 5(a).
9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000.00 capital and
surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company
must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:
a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;
b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aal, or Aaa;
2

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 5 of 10
c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-,
AA, AA+, or AAA;
d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating:
AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.
10. The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract
from the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of J.B., pursuant to which the Life Insurance
Company will agree to make payments periodically to petitioners, as the court-appointed
guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of J.B. for the following items of compensation:
a. For future unreimbursable Blue Cross Blue Shield Maximum-out-of-Pocket expenses,
beginning on the first anniversary of the date ofj udgment, an annual amount of
$6,550.00 to be paid up to the anniversary of the date of judgment in year 2041,
increasing at the rate of four percent ( 4%), compounded annually from the date of
judgment.
b. For future unreimbursable Insurance Maximum-out-of-Pocket expenses, beginning on
the anniversary of the date ofj udgment in year 2041, an annual amount of $7,350.00 to
be paid up to the anniversary of the date of judgment in year 2080, increasing at the rate
of four percent (4%), compounded annually from the date of judgment.
c. For future unreimbursable Medicare Supplement expenses, beginning on the
anniversary of the date of judgment in year 2080, an annual amount of $1,985.28 to be
paid for the remainder of J.B. 's life, increasing at the rate of four percent (4%),
compounded annually from the date of judgment.
d. For future unreimbursable Medicare Part D expenses, beginning on the anniversary of
the date of judgment in year 2080, an annual amount of $1,535.64 to be paid for the
remainder of J.B. 's life, increasing at the rate of four percent ( 4%), compounded annually
from the date of judgment.
At the sole discretion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the periodic payments may
be provided to the petitioners in monthly, quarterly, annual or other installments. The "annual
amounts" set forth above describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to the petitioners and do
not require that the payment be made in one annual installment. The petitioners will continue to
receive the annuity payments from the Life Insurance Company only so long as J.B. is alive at
the time that a particular payment is due. Written notice to the Secretary of Health and Human
3

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 6 of 10
Services, and the Life Insurance Company shall he provided within twenty (20) days of J.B.'s
death.
11. The annuity contract will be owned solely and exclusively by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services and will be purchased as soon as practicable following the entry of a
judgment in confonnity with this Stipulation. The parties stipulate and agree that the Secretary
of Health and Human Services and the United States of America are not responsible for the
payment of any sums other than the amounts set forth in paragraph 8 herein and the amounts
awarded pursuant to paragraph 12 herein, and that they do not guarantee or insure any of the
future annuity payments. Upon the purchase of the annuity contract, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and the United States of America are released from any and all obligations with
respect to future annuity payments.
12. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and
after petitioners have filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)( I), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings
before the special master to award reasonable attomeys' fees and costs inctmed in proceeding
upon this petition.
13. Petitioners and their attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to
this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which lhe Program is not primarily liable
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be
expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or
State health benefits progmms (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. §
1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.
4

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 7 of 10
14. Payments made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to
paragraph 12 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(i),
subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.
15. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award
for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursed expenses, the money provided
pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of J.B. as contemplated by a strict
construction of 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa-15(g) and (h).
16. Petitioners represent that they presently are, or within 90 days of the date of
judgment will become, duly authorized to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of J.B.'s estate
under the laws of the State of Texas. No payments pursuant to this Stipulation shall be made
until petitioners provide the Secretary with documentation establishing their appointment as
guardian(s)/conservator(s) of J.B. 's estate. If petitiom:rs are not authorized by a court of
competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of J.B. at the time a
payment pursuant to this Stipulation is to be made, any such payment shall be paid to the party or
parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of
the estate of J.B. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the
Secretary.
17. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 12, petitioners, in their
individual capacities and as legal representatives of J.B., on behalf of themselves, J.B., and her
heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, do forever irrevocably and
unconditionally release, acquit and discharge the United States and the Secretary of Health and
Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments,
5

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 8 of 10
claims, damages, loss of services, expenses and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that
have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Cou11 of Federal
Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-10 et
seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or
unsuspected personal injuries to or death of J.B. resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from
the vaccinations administered on July 27, 2015, as alleged by petitioners in a petition for vaccine
compensation filed on or about January 31, 2017, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as
petition No. 17-147V.
18. If J.B. should die prior to entry ofj udgment, this agreement shall be voidable upon
proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties.
19. If the special master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the tenns
of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in confonnity with a
decision that is in complete confo1mity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties'
settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party.
20. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and
damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, except
as otherwise noted in paragraph 12 above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the
parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated
and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this
Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties' respective positions as to liability and/or
amount of damages, and further, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the
items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement.
6

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 9 of 10
21. Petitioners hereby authorize respondent to disclose documents filed by petitioners in
this case consistent with the Privacy Act and the routine uses described in the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program System of Records, No. 09-15-0056.
22. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the
Secretary of Health and Human Services that the vaccines caused J.B. to suffer from morph ea or
any other injury or condition.
23. All rights and obligations of petitioners hereunder shall apply equalJy to petitioners'
heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and/or assigns as legal representatives of J.B.
END OF STIPULATION
7

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 70 Filed 04/09/20 Page 10 of 10
Respectfully submitted,
ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR AUTHORIZED REPRSENTATIVE
PETITIONERS: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL:
- h.---- -
Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-0146
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR
OF THE SECRETARY OF HEALT H RESPONDENT:
AND HUMAN SERVICES:
LAAr2a.,
71-
TAMARA OVERBY LINDA S. RENZI
Acting Director, Division oflnjury Senior Trial Counsel
Compensation Programs Torts Branch
Healthcare Systems Bureau Civil Division
U.S. Department of Health U.S. Department of Justice
and Human Services P.O. Box 146
5600 Fishers Lane Benjamin Franklin Station
Parklawn Building, Mail Stop l IC-26 Washington, DC 20044-0146
Rockville, MD 20857 Tel: (202) 616-4133
8

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00147-1
Date issued/filed: 2021-08-05
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 07/06/2021) regarding 74 DECISION of Special Master, Signed by Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran. (sw) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 80 Filed 08/05/21 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-0147V
M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their Minor Chief Special Master Corcoran
Child, J.B.,
Filed: July 6, 2021
Petitioners,
v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Relief
from Judgment under RCFC
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 60(b)(6); Guardianship Delays;
HUMAN SERVICES, Covid-19 Pandemic; Diphtheria
Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP)
Respondent. Vaccine; Polio Inactivated Virus (IPV)
Vaccine; Morphea
Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.
Heather Lynn Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION GRANTING RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT1
On January 31, 2017, M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their Minor Child, J.B., filed a
petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners alleged that J.B. suffered
morphea as a result of receiving the Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (“DTaP”) and
Polio Inactivated Virus (“IPV”) vaccines on July 27, 2015. Petition at 1-2; Stipulation, filed
December 19, 2019, at ¶¶ 2-4 (ECF No. 63) (“Stipulation”). Petitioners further alleged that
the vaccines were administered in the United States and that there had been no prior
award or settlement of a civil action for damages on behalf of J.B. as a result of her
condition. Petition at 1-5; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the vaccines
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 80 Filed 08/05/21 Page 2 of 4
caused J.B. to suffer from morphea or any other injury or her current condition.”
Stipulation at ¶ 6.
On December 19, 2019, the parties filed the Stipulation, stating that a decision
should be entered awarding compensation. On December 20, 2019, I issued a decision
on the parties’ Stipulation awarding damages to Petitioners (ECF No. 64). On December
23, 2019, judgment was entered (ECF No. 67).
The December 20, 2019 decision and December 23, 2019 judgment, based on the
December 19, 2019 Stipulation, provided that Petitioners would receive a lump sum cash
award for pain and suffering and first year life care expenses. Decision, issued Dec. 20,
2019, at *2 (ECF No. 64), and Judgment, entered Dec. 23, 2019, at *1 (ECF No. 67). The
decision and judgment indicated that the award would also include “[a]n amount sufficient
to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the Stipulation.” Id.
Paragraph 10 of the Stipulation indicated that the annuity would make payments
“beginning on the first anniversary of the date of judgment, an annual amount of
$6,550.00.” Stipulation at ¶10.
On March 8, 2021, Respondent filed a Joint Motion for Relief from Judgment and
Entry of Modified Judgment (ECF No. 73) (“Mot.”). The parties explained that after entry
of judgment, Petitioners filed to establish a guardianship of the estate of J.B. with the local
probate court in Texas. Mot. at *2. However, Petitioners reported to Respondent that the
probate court had “closed indefinitely due to the Covid 19 pandemic.” Id.
The parties report that the probate court recently reopened, and on March 2, 2021
issued letters of guardianship certifying that Petitioners had been appointed as permanent
guardians of the estate of J.B. on October 8, 2020, and qualified as such on December
9, 2020. Mot. at *2.
The parties explain that due to the time that had elapsed since the December 23,
2019 judgment:
[W]e are now nearly three months into the second year after judgment.
Under the terms set forth in the parties’ joint stipulation, annuity payments
were to begin on the first anniversary of the date of judgment, which would
have required the life insurance company to make payments due prior to
the date of purchase of the annuity contract. Respondent has been advised
by the annuity companies that they do not have the capacity to make such
payments in arrears.
Mot. at *2.
The parties request that the judgment be modified to direct that compensation for
“Year 2 life care expenses that would otherwise have been paid by the life insurance
company ($6,812.00), be included in initial cash, bringing total initial cash for life care
expense to $13,362.00. With this revision, annuity payments would begin on the second
2

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 80 Filed 08/05/21 Page 3 of 4
anniversary of the date of judgment in 2021 rather than on the first anniversary, as
originally contemplated.” Mot. at *3.
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 36, a party may seek relief from judgment under Rule
60 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Rule 60(b)
contains five specific circumstances and a catch-all that permits modification of a
judgment for “any other reason that justifies relief.” RCFC 60(b)(6). The parties’ joint
motion seeks relief under Rule 60(b)(6).
As a remedial provision, Rule 60(b) is to be “liberally construed for the purpose of
doing substantial justice.” Patton v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 25 F.3d 1021, 1030
(Fed. Cir. 1994). Special masters have discretion under Rule 60(b) whether to grant relief
and to weigh equitable factors. See McCray v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 11-
567V, 2014 WL 2858593, at *1 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. May 29, 2014) (citing CNA Corp. v.
United States, 83 Fed. Cl. 1, 7 (2008)).
Here, I find that the parties have established a basis for amendment of the
December 23, 2019 judgment under RCFC 60(b)(6). The motion was made within a
reasonable time, and seeks to provide the compensation agreed to and awarded, albeit
in a slightly different manner due to pandemic-related delays in establishing guardianship.
I find that these circumstances constitute sufficient grounds to grant the relief requested
under RCRC 60(b)(6).
For the reasons stated above, I GRANT the parties’ Joint Motion for Relief
from Judgment. Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby instructed to amend the
December 23, 2019 judgment in this matter as follows, substituting the language
below:
1. A lump sum of $125,862.00, representing compensation for life care
expenses expected to be incurred during the first two years after the
original judgment dated December 23, 2019 ($13,362.00) and pain and
suffering ($112,500.00), in the form of a check payable to Petitioners
as guardians of the estate of J.B. for the benefit of J.B.;
2. A lump sum of $50,000.00, representing compensation for past
unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to
Petitioners, M.B. and J.B.; and
3. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in
paragraph 10 of the parties’ stipulation, paid to the life insurance
company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life
Insurance Company”). Annuity payments shall begin on the second
anniversary of the original date of judgment, December 23, 2019,
consistent with paragraph (1) above.
3

Case 1:17-vv-00147-UNJ Document 80 Filed 08/05/21 Page 4 of 4
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk
of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
4