VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00044 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00044 Petitioner: JACQUELINE NICOLE BRASCHE on behalf of and as parent of C.B. Filed: 2017-07-21 Decided: 2017-07-24 Vaccine: Vaccination date: Condition: Outcome: dismissed Award amount USD: AI-assisted case summary: Jacqueline Nicole Brasche, as parent of C.B., filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation on July 21, 2017. The respondent is the Secretary of Health and Human Services. On July 24, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the case was dismissed without prejudice, and judgment was not to enter. No specific vaccine, injury, or award details were provided as this was a procedural dismissal. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00044-0 Date issued/filed: 2017-08-23 Pages: 1 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 07/24/2017) regarding 14 Order Concluding Proceedings ( Signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen.)(mpj) Copy to parties. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:17-vv-00044-UNJ Document 15 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 24, 2017 * * * * * * * * * * * * * JACQUELINE NICOLE BRASCHE on * behalf of and as parent of C.B., * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 17-44V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation of Dismissal; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine Rule 21(a). * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 On July 21, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 13). In accordance with this rule, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master 1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it to the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa- 12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.