VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00025
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00025
Petitioner: Sean Taylor
Filed: 2017-01-06
Decided: 2019-01-09
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2015-11-04
Condition: left shoulder injury
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 50901

AI-assisted case summary:
Sean Taylor filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging that his November 4, 2015 influenza vaccine caused him to suffer a left shoulder injury. He stated that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that he suffered residual effects for more than six months, and that he had no prior award or settlement for his injury. Respondent denied that the flu vaccine caused his shoulder injury or any other condition. However, on November 8, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing that compensation should be awarded. The Chief Special Master found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Pursuant to the stipulation, Sean Taylor was awarded a lump sum of $50,901.62, representing compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act. The clerk was directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.

Theory of causation field:
unclear

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00025-0
Date issued/filed: 2018-04-27
Pages: 4
Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 1/31/2018) regarding 29 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, Scheduling Order. Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (rp) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 37 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 4
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-0025V
Filed: January 31, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
SEAN TAYLOR,
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Petitioner, Motion for Finding of Fact; Findings
v. of Fact; Onset; Influenza (Flu)
Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
SECRETARY OF HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Anne Carrion Toale, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
FACT RULING1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On January 6, 2017, Sean Taylor (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left shoulder injury
caused by a November 4, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccination. See Petition at 1-3. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. For
the reasons discussed below, the undersigned finds petitioner received his November 4,
2015 flu vaccination in his left deltoid and that the onset of petitioner’s left shoulder
injury was within 48 hours of his November 4, 2015 flu vaccination.
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 37 Filed 04/27/18 Page 2 of 4
I. Procedural History
On January 16, 2017, petitioner filed his medical records and affidavit marked as
Exhibits 1-6. (ECF No. 7.) He also filed a Statement of Completion. (ECF No. 8.)
Subsequently, during the initial status conference held on February 7, 2017, petitioner
agreed to file updated medical records and a supplemental affidavit addressing the
onset and sequela of his injury. (ECF No. 9.) Additional records, a second affidavit
from petitioner, and an amended Statement of Completion were filed on March 6, 2017.
(ECF Nos. 10-11.)
On June 13, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report. (ECF No. 16.)
Respondent recommended against awarding compensation to petitioner in this case.
(Id.) Respondent argued, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to show a logical
sequence of cause and effect because there was no evidence in the contemporaneous
records that petitioner received his flu vaccination in his left arm. (Id. at 4.) Respondent
argued petitioner has not demonstrated a proximate temporal relationship between his
vaccination and injury because petitioner did not seek medical attention for his shoulder
injury until more than four months after his vaccination and did not report that his pain
began within 48 hours of receiving his vaccination. (Id.)
Thereafter, at the undersigned’s request, petitioner filed a third affidavit
addressing the onset of his injury and the anatomical location of his vaccination. (ECF
No. 20.) A status conference was convened on October 26, 2017 and the parties
proposed petitioner file a Motion for a Finding of Fact. (ECF No. 22.) It was agreed the
undersigned would make an oral ruling on petitioner’s Motion for a Finding of Fact
subsequent to the filing of respondent’s response. (Id.) Petitioner further made an oral
motion seeking authority to issue subpoenas to petitioner’s local Walgreens and the
Walgreens corporate office for the purpose of obtaining any and all vaccination records.
(Id.) Petitioner’s motion was granted. (ECF Nos. 23-24).
On November 8, 2017, petitioner filed his Vaccine Administration Record from
Walgreens as Exhibit 10. (ECF No. 25-2). Thereafter, petitioner filed a Motion for a
Finding of Fact on November 27, 2017 arguing, in sum, that he experienced the onset
of symptoms consistent with a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
(“SIRVA”) immediately after his vaccination on November 4, 2015. (ECF No. 26).
Respondent filed a Response on December 14, 2017 arguing that the evidence does
not support a finding that petitioner’s symptoms began within 48 hours of his November
4, 2015 flu vaccine. (ECF No. 27 at 1). Respondent agreed however, that based on
petitioner’s Exhibit 10 petitioner’s November 4, 2015 flu vaccine was administered in his
left arm. (Id. citing Exhibit 10 at 3). Subsequently, the undersigned scheduled a
telephonic status conference for January 23, 2018 in order to provide her oral ruling on
petitioner’s Motion for Finding of Fact. (NON-PDF Status Conference Order filed
January 4, 2018.)
2

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 37 Filed 04/27/18 Page 3 of 4
II. Findings of Fact
A telephonic status conference was convened by the undersigned on January
23, 2018 and digitally recorded. (Minute Entry filed January 23, 2018.) Anne Toale
appeared on behalf of petitioner, and Lara Englund appeared on behalf of respondent.
Jocelyn McIntosh appeared as the OSM staff attorney managing this case.
The undersigned informed the parties that pursuant to the parties’ joint request
at the October 26, 2017 status conference and petitioner’s Motion for Finding of Fact,
she intended to make an oral ruling in regard to the site of petitioner’s vaccination and
the onset of petitioner’s shoulder injury pursuant to Vaccine Rule 8. The undersigned
further indicated that her findings of fact would be made without prejudice. The parties
consented. Accordingly, the undersigned made the following findings after a complete
review of the record to include: all medical records filed by petitioner, petitioner’s
affidavits, respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, petitioner’s Motion for a Finding of Fact and
respondent’s Response.
A. Site of Vaccine Administration
Although it appears this issue is no longer disputed, the undersigned finds
petitioner received an intramuscular flu vaccination in his left deltoid on November 4,
2015. (Pet. Ex. 1 at 2; Pet. Ex. 10 at 3.)
B. Onset of Injury
The undersigned further finds that petitioner suffered the onset of a shoulder
injury within 48 hours of the administration of his November 4, 2015 influenza
vaccination based on the following evidence.
Most compelling is petitioner’s physical therapy evaluation performed by Julie
Keen, PT on April 22, 2016. Ms. Keen recorded in the history section of her evaluation
“[d]ate of onset: 11/4/2015.” (Pet. Ex. 5 at 6.) The evaluation by Ms. Keen notes
“[p]atient is a 34 year old male who had onset of left shoulder pain after receiving a flu
shot on 11/4/2015.” (Pet. Ex. 5 at 5.)
Consistent evidence is available from petitioner’s March 9, 2016 appointment
with orthopedic surgeon, David Kovacevic, MD, who noted “[t]he patient developed
traumatic onset shoulder pain about 4 months ago . . . .” (Pet. Ex. 4 at 2.) “He
received a flu shot at Walgreens and he thinks the injection led to an injury to his left
shoulder.” (Id.)
Additionally, petitioner averred in his affidavits that “onset of pain started
immediately. It hurt more than a typical shot, but I assumed that it would be sore for a
few days and go away. The pain did not go away and actually became noticeably
worse.” (Exhibit 9 at ¶4; see Exhibit 7 at ¶¶ 5-6.)
3

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 37 Filed 04/27/18 Page 4 of 4
Based on the above evidence, the undersigned finds that petitioner experienced
the onset of his left shoulder injury within 48 hours of the administration of his
November 4, 2015 flu vaccination. Finally, the undersigned further finds that
petitioner’s explanation in his second and third affidavits reasonably explains his delay
in seeking treatment for his shoulder injury. (Exhibit 9 at ¶6; see Exhibit 7 at ¶¶ 7-10.)
III. Scheduling Order
In light of the above findings, the parties are directed to engage in
discussions to resolve this claim.
The following is hereby ORDERD:
 Petitioner shall file a status report by no later than February 23, 2018
indicating whether he has provided a demand to respondent.
 Respondent shall file a status report by no later than 30 days
subsequent to receiving petitioner’s demand indicating whether he
has provided a response to petitioner’s demand.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
4

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_17-vv-00025-1
Date issued/filed: 2019-01-09
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 11/09/2018) regarding 49 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. )(mpj) Service on parties made.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-25V
Filed: November 9, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
SEAN TAYLOR,
Petitioner,
Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
v.
Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
(Flu) Vaccine; Left Shoulder Injury
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Jessica Anne Olins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On January 6, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that his November 4, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccine
caused him to suffer a left shoulder injury. Stipulation, filed November 8, 2018, at ¶¶ 2,
4; see Petition at 1-3. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered
within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than
six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on his
behalf as a result of his injury. Stipulation at ¶¶ 3, 5; see Petition at ¶¶ 1, 11, 14-15.
“Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s shoulder injury or
any other injury or his current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 2 of 7
Nevertheless, on November 8, 2018, the parties filed the attached joint
stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The
undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court
in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
awards the following compensation:
A lump sum of $50,901.62 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:17-vv-00025-UNJ Document 56 Filed 01/09/19 Page 7 of 7