VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01698 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01698 Petitioner: Deborah Franklin Filed: 2016-12-28 Decided: 2018-04-11 Vaccine: Tdap Vaccination date: 2016-01-27 Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 135000 AI-assisted case summary: Deborah Franklin filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on December 28, 2016, alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after receiving a Tdap vaccination on January 27, 2016. She further alleged that she suffered residual effects or complications from her left SIRVA injuries for more than six months. Respondent denied that the Tdap immunization caused petitioner’s alleged SIRVA and/or any other injury. Nevertheless, on January 16, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The Chief Special Master found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Pursuant to the stipulation, Deborah Franklin was awarded a lump sum of $135,000.00 as compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act. The award was made in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01698-0 Date issued/filed: 2018-04-11 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 1/16/2018) regarding 41 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (rp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1698V Filed: January 16, 2018 UNPUBLISHED DEBORAH FRANKLIN, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Stipulation on Damages; Tdap Vaccination; Shoulder Injury Related Petitioner, to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner. Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On December 28, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). ”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving a Tdap vaccination on January 27, 2016. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed January 16, 2018, at ¶ 1. Petitioner further alleges she “suffered residual effects or complications from her left SIRVA injuries for more than six months.” Petition at 6; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies “that the Tdap immunization if the cause of petitioner’s alleged SIRVA and/or any other injury. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on January 16, 2018, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned awards the following compensation: A lump sum of $135,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id. The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 3 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 4 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 5 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 6 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01698-UNJ Document 45 Filed 04/11/18 Page 7 of 7