Matthew J. Johnson v. HHS - Hepatitis A, small fiber neuropathy (2025)
Case summary [AI summaries can sometimes make mistakes]
Matthew J. Johnson filed a petition for compensation on December 9, 2016, alleging that he suffered from small fiber neuropathy (SFN) as a result of receiving the hepatitis A/B vaccine (Twinrix) on March 18, 2015.
At the time of vaccination, Mr. Johnson was 37 years old.
He reported experiencing symptoms approximately eight days after vaccination, initially presenting as joint pain, fatigue, and weakness, which evolved into numbness, tingling, and altered temperature sensation in his extremities, consistent with SFN. After reviewing medical records, expert testimony, and medical literature, Special Master Thomas L.
Gowen found that Mr. Johnson had established by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered from small fiber neuropathy and that the Twinrix vaccine caused his condition.
The Special Master concluded that SFN can be an autoimmune disorder triggered by vaccines, similar to Guillain-Barré syndrome, and that the temporal relationship between the vaccination and the onset of symptoms was medically acceptable. The case was ruled entitled to compensation, with a separate damages order to follow.
Petitioner was represented by Richard Gage of Richard Gage, P.C., and respondent was represented by Benjamin P. Warder of the United States Department of Justice.
The decision was issued on January 23, 2025, based on a ruling signed by Special Master Thomas L. Gowen on December 30, 2024.
Theory of causation
Petitioner Matthew J. Johnson, age 37, received the hepatitis A/B vaccine (Twinrix) on March 18, 2015. He alleged that this vaccination caused him to develop small fiber neuropathy (SFN). Petitioner's medical records documented symptoms beginning approximately eight days post-vaccination, including joint pain, fatigue, weakness, numbness, tingling, and altered temperature sensation in his extremities, consistent with SFN. Petitioner's treating neurologist, Dr. James Bobenhouse, and expert witness Dr. Marcel Kinsbourne opined that the Twinrix vaccine caused petitioner's SFN, theorizing an autoimmune response triggered by the vaccine, potentially through molecular mimicry, similar to Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Dr. Kinsbourne cited medical literature suggesting SFN can be an immune-mediated disorder and that small nerve fibers can be targets for autoimmune attack, analogous to GBS. Respondent's expert, Dr. Vinay Chaudhry, opined that petitioner did not have SFN and that the vaccine did not cause his condition, arguing that SFN is not typically autoimmune and is not similar to GBS, and that petitioner's symptoms and test results were inconsistent with SFN. The Special Master, Thomas L. Gowen, found that petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered from SFN and that the Twinrix vaccine caused his condition. The Special Master relied on the clinical history, examinations, and expert opinions, particularly Dr. Kinsbourne's, finding the temporal relationship medically acceptable and the autoimmune theory plausible. The case was ruled entitled to compensation. Petitioner was represented by Richard Gage, P.C., and respondent by the U.S. Department of Justice. The decision date was January 23, 2025.
Source PDFs
USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01630