VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01535 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01535 Petitioner: Edithe Swensen Filed: 2017-11-17 Decided: 2018-02-08 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: 2015-11-24 Condition: Left Shoulder SIRVA injury, tendinitis, impingement, infraspinatus tendinopathy, superior labrum tear, and subdeltoid bursitis Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 85000 AI-assisted case summary: Edithe Swensen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on November 17, 2016, alleging that her influenza vaccine received on November 24, 2015, caused a left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), along with tendinitis, impingement, infraspinatus tendinopathy, superior labrum tear, and subdeltoid bursitis. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit. On June 19, 2017, the Chief Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding Ms. Swensen entitled to compensation. The respondent conceded that her alleged injury was consistent with SIRVA and was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine. Based on this concession and the evidence, entitlement was granted. Subsequently, on September 21, 2017, the respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation, recommending an award of $85,000.00, which Ms. Swensen agreed to. This amount was intended to cover all elements of compensation available under the Vaccine Act. The decision dated February 8, 2018, awarded Ms. Swensen a lump sum payment of $85,000.00. Theory of causation field: Off-Table Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01535-0 Date issued/filed: 2018-02-08 Pages: 4 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 9/21/2017) regarding 30 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer. Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey. (rp) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:16-vv-01535-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 4 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1535V Filed: September 21, 2017 UNPUBLISHED EDITHE SWENSEN, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Petitioner, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder v. Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Bruce W. Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner. Amy P. Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On November 17, 2016, Edithe Swensen (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that her receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 24, 2015, caused her to suffer a left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as well as “tendinitis, impingement, infraspinatus tendinopathy, superior labrum tear, and subdeltoid bursitis.” Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters. On June 19, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On September 21, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:16-vv-01535-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/08/18 Page 2 of 4 awarded $85,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Edithe Swensen. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:16-vv-01535-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/08/18 Page 3 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) EDITHE SWENSEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 16-1535V (ECF) v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items On June 19, 2017, Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $85,000.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees. II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through a lump sum payment of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. 1 Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages. 1 Case 1:16-vv-01535-UNJ Document 39 Filed 02/08/18 Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Amy P. Kokot AMY P. KOKOT Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-4118 Dated: September 21, 2017 2 ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 2: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01535-2 Date issued/filed: 2018-04-30 Pages: 2 Docket text: PUBLIC ORDER/RULING (Originally filed: 06/19/2017) regarding 18 Ruling on Entitlement ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:16-vv-01535-UNJ Document 41 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1535V Filed: June 19, 2017 Unpublished * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EDITHE SWENSEN, * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bruce Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner. Amy Kokot, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On November 17, 2016, Edithe Swensen (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered “injuries including a Left Shoulder SIRVA injury, tendinitis, impingement, infraspinatus tendinopathy, superior labrum tear, and subdeltoid bursitis caused-in-fact by the adverse effects of an influenza vaccination received on November 24, 2015.” Petition at 1; accord. Petition at ¶ 25. Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccination intramuscularly in the United States, has suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her injury alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 2, 26-28. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:16-vv-01535-UNJ Document 41 Filed 04/30/18 Page 2 of 2 On June 16, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case for her SIRVA of the left shoulder and its related sequelae. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA and that it was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine she received on November 24, 2015.” Id. at 4. Respondent further indicates that “based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act.” Id. In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 2