VICP Registry Case Source Bundle
Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01294
Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01294
Petitioner: Anthony Casciano
Filed: 2016-10-07
Decided: 2017-10-20
Vaccine: influenza
Vaccination date: 2015-10-14
Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)
Outcome: compensated
Award amount USD: 50000

AI-assisted case summary:
Anthony Casciano filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program on October 7, 2016. He alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) caused-in-fact by his October 14, 2015 influenza vaccination. Mr. Casciano further alleged that he experienced residual effects of his injury for more than six months and that there had been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his alleged injury. The respondent denied that the vaccine caused Mr. Casciano's alleged injury or any other condition. Nevertheless, on March 16, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing that compensation should be awarded. Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the decision of the Court. Anthony Casciano was awarded a lump sum of $50,000.00, payable to him, as compensation for all items of damages. Petitioner's counsel was Nancy Routh Meyers of Ward Black Law, and respondent's counsel was Alexis B. Babcock of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Theory of causation field:
Petitioner Anthony Casciano alleged a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) caused-in-fact by his October 14, 2015 influenza vaccination, with residual effects lasting more than six months. Respondent denied causation. The parties filed a joint stipulation on March 16, 2017, agreeing to an award of compensation. The Special Master adopted the stipulation. Petitioner was awarded a lump sum of $50,000.00 for all damages. The specific medical mechanism, onset, symptoms, diagnostic tests, treatments, and expert witnesses were not described in the public decision. The theory of causation was off-Table. The decision was issued by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey on October 20, 2017. Petitioner's counsel was Nancy Routh Meyers, and respondent's counsel was Alexis B. Babcock.

Public staged source text:

================================================================================
DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01294-0
Date issued/filed: 2017-10-20
Pages: 7
Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 03/16/2017) regarding 24 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer (Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Copy to parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 7
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-1294V
Filed: March 16, 2017
UNPUBLISHED
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ANTHONY CASCIANO, *
*
Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v. * Influenza;
* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Nancy Routh Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.
Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On October 7, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) caused-in-fact by his October 14, 2015 influenza vaccination.
Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed March 16, 2017, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that he
experienced residual effects of his injury for more than six months and that there has
been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his alleged
injury. Petition at 2; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner’s alleged
injury was caused-in-fact by his flu vaccination, and denies that the vaccine caused any
other injury or his current condition. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
Nevertheless, on March 16, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 7
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2

Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 3 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 4 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 5 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 6 of 7

Case 1:16-vv-01294-UNJ Document 31 Filed 10/20/17 Page 7 of 7