VICP Registry Case Source Bundle Canonical URL: https://vicp-registry.org/case/USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01223 Package ID: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01223 Petitioner: Shauna Lou Roesler Filed: 2017-09-05 Decided: 2018-05-24 Vaccine: influenza Vaccination date: Condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) Outcome: compensated Award amount USD: 85000 AI-assisted case summary: Shauna Lou Roesler filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, alleging she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) from an influenza vaccination. The petition stated that the vaccination was administered in the United States, that she experienced residual effects for more than six months, and that she had not received any prior award or settlement for her condition. Respondent denied that the flu immunization caused petitioner's alleged SIRVA or any other injury. Despite the denial, the parties filed a joint stipulation on September 5, 2017, agreeing that compensation should be awarded. The Chief Special Master found the stipulation reasonable and adopted it as the Court's decision. Pursuant to the stipulation, Ms. Roesler was awarded a lump sum of $85,000.00, representing compensation for all items of damages available under the Vaccine Act. The clerk was directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. Theory of causation field: unclear Public staged source text: ================================================================================ DOCUMENT 1: USCOURTS-cofc-1_16-vv-01223-1 Date issued/filed: 2018-05-24 Pages: 7 Docket text: PUBLIC DECISION (Originally filed: 09/05/2017) regarding 29 DECISION Stipulation/Proffer ( Signed by Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey.)(mpj) Service on parties made. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 7 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1223V Filed: September 5, 2017 UNPUBLISHED SHAUNA LOU ROESLER, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza Petitioner, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury v. Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Sam Shirazi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On September 29, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) from the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed September 5, 2017, at ¶ 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccination was administered within the United States, that she experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition. Petition at 9; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the flu immunization is the cause of petitioner’s alleged SIRVA and/or any other injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 2 of 7 Nevertheless, on September 5, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned awards the following compensation: A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id. The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 3 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 4 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 5 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 6 of 7 Case 1:16-vv-01223-UNJ Document 40 Filed 05/24/18 Page 7 of 7